The BBC One program Antiques Roadshow has discovered a “lost masterpiece” by 17th Century master Anthony van Dyck. A priest in Nottingham, Father Jaime, had purchased the painting for $660, and brought it to a filming of Antiques Roadshow to be…
On Friday’s edition of “PBS News Hour,” former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich took Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI)’s economic advisor Scott Winship to task for saying that income inequality isn’t a significant problem in the country. In November…
High
school social studies teacher Al Levie refused to accept an award from
Rep. Paul Ryan during a ceremony last week. (Image source: YouTube)
A Wisconsin teacher refused to accept
an award from Rep. Paul Ryan during a ceremony last week, saying he
couldn’t do so “in good conscience” because of the Republican
congressman’s politics.
Al Levie, a high school social studies
teacher in Racine, Wis., was one of three recipients of a Martin Luther
King Jr. humanitarian award during a celebration honoring the late civil
rights leader. Ryan, who represents the district, was on hand to
present congressional recognitions to each award winner, the Kenosha
News reported:
After Ryan spoke, Levie
criticized the congressman’s policies before being walked off the stage.
Levie had earlier stated that he would like to see collective
bargaining restored in Wisconsin, fair immigration reform and a fair tax
system among other suggestions.
In a video of the ceremony, Ryan is
seen stepping from behind the podium to hand the award to Levie, who
backs away and instead turns to speak to the audience. His words aren’t
audible, but according to the video’s captions he said, “I can’t in good
conscience accept this award, as a humanitarian, Paul Ryan stands for
everything I don’t believe in.”
“Oh come on,” one person is heard saying.
“For the kids!” someone else adds.
The video was posted by Wisconsin Jobs
Now, a coalition of community groups from across the state that
advocates for “the 99 percent.” Levie appeared on the video afterward to
explain his protest.
“I would not accept the award from
Paul Ryan because Paul Ryan is a lackey for the 1 percent,” he said.
“Paul Ryan had no business at a Martin Luther King event, it’s totally
hypocritical. On the one hand he votes to slash health care, while on
the other hand, King dedicated his life and he died for it, for people
to have adequate healthcare, to have adequate jobs.”
“King made it very clear that he was
on the side of working people,” he continued. “Ryan on the other hand,
he has absolutely no affinity for the working class and for him to come
to an event where somebody of King’s stature was honored is wrong.”
According to the Racine Journal Times,
Levie serves with Voces de la Frontera, an advocacy group for immigrant
and low wage worker rights, and is part of the local NAACP. He’s also a
teacher and program director for the Wisconsin Correctional Service.
Освободившись киска член Бунт хочет Путина из : "Мы все еще хотел бы сделать то, что они разместили нас в тюрьму за 'По Agence France -PresseПятница, 27 Декабрь 2013 7:50 ESTНадежда Толоконникова Pussy Riot AFPОсвободил
член Pussy Riot панк-группы заявил в пятницу рокеры еще хотел
президента России Владимира Путина из власти , добавив, что она хотела
бы освободил экс- магната Михаила Ходорковского баллотироваться на
выборах и заменить его."Насколько
обеспокоен Владимир Путин , наше отношение к ним не изменилось ",
сказал Надежда Толоконникова вместе со своим напарником Мария Алехина ,
выступая на их первой пресс-конференции после их освобождения в начале
этой недели ."Мы все же хотел бы делать то, что они разместили нас в тюрьму за . Мы все же хотел бы изгнать его " .В
феврале 2012 года несколько членов Pussy Riot прыгнул вокруг алтаря
церкви и пытались петь то, что они называют " панк молитва ", призвав
Девы Марии "загнать Путина из ".Они сказали, что осуждая политические связи между Путиным и Русской Православной Церкви и не хотел обидеть верующих .Она
сказала, что хотела бы критик Кремля Михаила Ходорковского , который
был на прошлой неделе выпустила под помиловании , баллотироваться на
пост президента ."Я
бы очень хотел , чтобы пригласить Михаил Борисович на этот пост ",
ссылаясь на критику Кремля , который провел более десяти лет в тюрьме по
имени и отчеству .«Я солидарен с тем, что , " добавил Алехина .Отвечая
на вопрос на пресс-конференции для описания Путина , Толоконникова
сказал, что был "закрыт , непрозрачный » и « чекист », используя термин,
с советских времен для члена служб безопасности.Ранее в пятницу молодые женщины, которые как имеют маленьких детей , вернулся в Москву после воссоединения в Сибири .Алехина
, 25, уже прошел через Москву после освобождения из ее колонии на ее
пути встретиться Толоконникова , 24, сразу же после ее освобождения
из-под стражи в Сибири.Их выпуск на два месяца раньше от своих двухлетних срокам тюремного заключения было принято после амнистии поддержке Путина.После
трюка на Христа Спасителя Алехина , Толоконникова и Екатерина Самуцевич
, 31, были выявлены , позже арестован и в августе 2012 года признан
виновным по обвинению в хулиганстве на почве религиозной ненависти .Самуцевич
был выпущен в октябре после того, как дали условное наказание, , но
Московский городской суд оставил в силе по апелляции двухлетние сроки
тюремного лагеря для Толоконникова и Алехина .
Sen.
Tom Coburn, R-Okla., made headlines last week for entertaining the idea,
at a meeting with constituents, that President Obama might be
impeachable.
But it’s what he said about the plausibility of
ending Obamacare — not about the wild fantasy of impeachment — that
deserves real attention.
Coburn was an early and vocal critic of
conservative efforts to make funding the government contingent on
President Obama agreeing to defund his own healthcare law. He warned
conservatives that Obama would never agree to this, the government would
shut down, Obamacare implementation would continue apace, Republicans
would face backlash, cave and the whole strategy would fail.
That
analysis remains correct, and Coburn’s conservative bona fides made it
easier for other Republicans to line up against Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas;
Mike Lee, R-Utah; et al., against the defund strategy.
Well, it turns out Coburn isn’t so levelheaded when it comes to the debt limit.
On
Wednesday, a constituent asked Coburn, “What other alternatives are out
there to keep this horrible bill from being implemented on October 1?”
Coburn, as my colleague Joan Walsh noted, responded thusly:
Oh,
well the debt limit. The debt limit. The debt limit. You attach it to
the debt limit. The point is that you attach a repeal of the mandatory
spending to the debt limit. Otherwise the debt limit doesn’t go up.
Let
me make a point…the one thing that average American agrees with us is
the government wastes money. The one thing that the average American
agrees with us is that trimming down the size of the federal government
is a good thing. That’s an 80 percent issue in this country. Restricting
the debt limit does both that and repeals the Obamacare. Or at least
delay it for a couple years. Because it’s an absolute disaster.
Remember,
we lost the ’12 election because no one knew what we were for, but we
also lost the independent voter…because we didn’t seem reasonable to
them in our approach to governing. People didn’t know what we were for.
We talked about what we were against. And what we ought to do is put out
a message of “here’s where we can actually do something that will
actually make a difference for our kids. Not only will we have an impact
on Obamacare, we’ll also have an impact on spending.”
advertisement
You can watch it starting at about minute 41.
The
strategic logic here is amazing on a number of levels. First, Coburn
identifies the Republicans’ two big problems with voters as
unreasonableness and a negative agenda, then proposes solving them by
threatening to destroy the economy unless Obama agrees to roll back a
bunch of stuff, including the Affordable Care Act. He’s clearly never
heard the “doctor, doctor it hurts when I do this!” joke. And he’s a doctor!
He
also defines the difference between a positive and negative agenda as a
public relations campaign selling the latter as the former. This is the
GOP’s Field of Dreams: If you destroy something, but tell people you’re
building it, they will come.
But the most important part is that
Coburn either believes this strategy will work, or knows it won’t and is
willing to pander despite the dangerous potential consequences:
default, lender panic, interest rate spikes, economic collapse. Now, I
remain confident that Congress will increase the debt limit without
incident and without Obama conceding anything significant. But either
way the turn is troublesome.
Coburn is one of Obama’s closest
personal friends in the Senate. But he also has impeccable conservative
credentials, and his imprimatur on both strategic and substantive issues
carries unusual weight with his colleagues. Where Coburn goes, they
often follow. So when he came out against the government shutdown
strategy, it implied the existence of a stable core of sanity at the
center of the Senate GOP conference, in the same way that the rotation
patterns of spiral galaxies imply the existence of dark matter.
Of
course, there are plenty of other Republicans in the Senate, and
Democrats only need five or six of them to decide they have nothing to
gain by replaying the 2011 strategy. We’ve already seen more than that
break ranks to pass immigration reform and confirm several Obama
nominees. But if Coburn takes the position that gutting Obamacare is a
terrible demand in a government shutdown fight, but a big winner in the
debt limit fight, there won’t be much room for error.
Brian Beutler is Salon's political writer. Email him at bbeutler@salon.com and follow him on Twitter at @brianbeutler.
More Brian Beutler.
Republicans and their teabagger comrades are wont to claim they are
the real Americans, and those residing in the former Confederacy like to
claim they live in the real America. Never mind that over 150 years ago
they waged the nation’s deadliest war to tear America apart, or that
they threaten a nullification crusade and secession that led to the
Civil War. Republican governors, primarily from Southern states and all
ALEC alumni, are running a television ad campaign touting the
achievements of Republicans in Southern states they intend on spreading
to the rest of the country. It is doubtless the America they created in
the South is the goal the Koch brothers, Republicans, and American
Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) have for the entire nation. However,
if the entire country ever resembled the Southern United States, it
would rival the poorest third world nation on the planet and besides
less-than-poverty wages, 30% of children living in dire poverty, and
religious fundamentalism as higher education, it would be very deadly
indeed.
As if the Southern states did not already distinguish themselves with
seriously depressing statistics in every quality of life category,
eleven of the top 12 states with the highest mortality rates are located
in the South. As a contrast, the top 10 states with the lowest mortality
rates are in the Northeast and Western United States and of the 25
states that are above the national average, 19 are blue and just six are
red. Conversely, of the 25 states below the national average, 17 are
red and just eight are blue. It is no coincidence that states with no
environmental policies, little to no access to healthcare or insurance,
and no workplace regulations are uniquely Republican-controlled Southern
states and all contribute to the higher than normal mortality rates.
Every factor contributing to higher than normal mortality rates is
the result of conservative policies that were paid for by the Koch
brothers and enacted by ALEC with propaganda from Americans for
Prosperity, the Heritage Foundation, and Wall Street. They are all
organizations representing corporations benefiting from low wages, no
corporate taxes, no environmental protections, no labor protections, and
no healthcare for what Southerners call the real America.
It is difficult for reasonable Americans to comprehend why people
living in the Southern United States vote for Republicans when their
policies have transformed the former Confederacy into a poverty-ridden
region including the 14 states with the highest child poverty rates in
the nation, and in many cases highest in the world. The South also has
the distinction of having the lowest graduation rates in the nation
because conservatives have convinced ignorant Southerners that higher
education is the purview of snobbish Democrats who will turn good
Christian children into dirty fascist liberals, so why graduate from
high school. It is likely why Southerners elect Republicans who promise
to transfer taxpayer-funded public school money to private religious
schools to teach the next generation that destroying the environment is
of no consequence because Jesus is returning to “rapture” the faithful
to heaven and leave sinners behind to suffer a polluted environment
during the War of Armageddon.
Every one of the low Southern state ratings are due to voter
ignorance that drives them to vote against their best interests and
elect representatives beholden to the Kochs and ALEC that created a
workforce that made the South the preferred third-world
wage-base for first world nations outsourcing their manufacturing.
Southern states have supplanted countries like Indonesia, India, and
Pakistan because their residents reliably elect Republicans who enacted
ALEC legislation such as right to work for less laws, no overtime pay,
no workplace safety, and no vacation time every civilized nation
provides their workforce.
It is possible Republicans take advantage of Southern state residents
due to their predilection to fundamentalist Christianity, and it
informs the ease at which Republicans convince voters that “the other,” “un-American,” and “not like us” President is in a crusade to destroy America as a Christian nation. It is no coincidence that Southern Republicans pass “no Sharia”
laws, Draconian abortion laws, and convince residents voter suppression
laws are necessary to preserve their Christian way of life. It is
likely that many Southerners understand they live, work, and will die
prematurely in a hazardous region of the country, but if Christ’s return
is just around the corner, why worry or change?
Americans living in the Southern states have the lowest wages, least
access to healthcare, highest mortality rate, highest child poverty
rate, lowest graduation rate, and least amount of protections for their
residents. But they have no-one but themselves to blame because they
elect Republicans out of fear, ignorance, and in some distortion of
reality; a sense of pride that they are the real Americans living in
real America. However, it is a conservative construct because the Koch
brothers bought and paid for it to realize their vision of a transformed
America.
It is getting difficult to feel empathy for ignorant Southerners, and
if not for the people who want better wages, education, food and
healthcare for their children, and a safe environment to work and live,
it seems it would be in America’s best interest to let the South secede.
However, this is America and decent Americans will continue sending
their tax dollars to house, feed, provide healthcare, and attempt to
educate a population that is determined to undermine the entire nation
and fulfill the Koch brothers’ dream of fifty states as hazardous as the
South.
If Republican Led ‘Real America’ Was a Country It Would Be the 3rd Poorest on Earth was written by Rmuse for PoliticusUSA.
In politics, as in sports, you can’t win ‘em all. With a divided government and a House of Representatives firmly in the control of tea partiers, it was a tough year for progressives in Washington – one marked by the painful cuts of sequestration…
The world faces two potentially existential threats, according to the linguist and political philosopher Noam Chomsky. “There are two major dark shadows that hover over everything, and they’re getting more and more serious,” Chomsky said. “The…
The
night before the 2008 Nevada Republican convention, the Ron Paul
delegates all met at a Reno high school. Although I’d called myself a
libertarian for almost my entire adult life, it was my first exposure to
the wider movement.
And boy, was it a circus. Many members of the
group were obsessed with the gold standard, the Kennedy assassination
and the Fed. Although Libertarians believe government is incompetent,
many of them subscribe to the most fringe conspiracy theories
imaginable. Airplanes are poisoning America with chemicals (chemtrails)
or the moon landings were faked. Nothing was too far out. A great many
of them really think that 9-11 was an inside job. Even while basking in
the electoral mainstream, the movement was overflowing with obvious
hokum.
During the meeting, a Ron Paul staffer, a smart and
charismatic young woman, gave a tip to the group for the upcoming
convention.
“Dress normal,” she said. “Wear suits, and don’t bring
signs or flags. Don’t talk about conspiracy theories. Just fit in.” Her
advice was the kind you might hear given to an insane uncle at
Thanksgiving.
Then next day, I ran into that same operative at the
convention, and I complimented her because Ron Paul delegates were
being accepted into the crowd. I added, “We‘re going to win this thing.”
“Bring in the clowns,” she said, and smiled before I lost her in the mass of people.
I
will never forget that moment: Bring in the clowns. At the time, I
considered myself a thoughtful person, yet I could hardly claim to be
one if you judged me by the company I kept. The young lady knew
something I had not yet learned: most of our supporters were totally
fucking nuts.
I came by my own libertarian sensibilities honestly.
I grew up in a mining town that produced gold, silver and copper; but
above all, Battle Mountain, Nev. made libertarians. Raised on 40-acre
square of brown sage brush and dead earth, we burned our own garbage and
fired guns in the back yard.
After leaving my small town
upbringing, I learned that libertarians are made for lots of reasons,
like reading the bad fiction of Ayn Rand or perhaps the passable writing
of Robert Heinlein. In my experience, most seemed to be poor, white and
undereducated. They were contortionists, justifying the excesses of the
capitalist elite, despite being victims if libertarian politics
succeed.
If you think that selfishness and cruelty are fantastic
personal traits, you might be a libertarian. In the movement no one will
ever call you an asshole, but rather, say you believe in radical
individualism.
Yet
I don’t want to gloss over the good things about libertarians. They are
generally supportive of the gay community, completely behind marijuana
legalization and are often against ill-considered foreign wars, but a
few good ideas don’t make up for some spectacularly bad ones. Their
saving grace is a complete lack of organizational ability, which is why
they are always trying to take over the Republican Party, rather than
create a party of their own.
The Ron Paul delegates were able to
take over the Nevada convention in 2008, howling, screeching and
grinding it to a painful halt. I was part of the mob, and once we took
over, we were unable to get anything done. The national delegates were
appointed in secret later.
The Republican convention didn’t turn
me off of libertarians, but I started losing respect for the movement
while watching the financial meltdown. Libertarians were (rightly)
furious when our government bailed out the banks, but they fought
hardest against help for ordinary Americans. They hated unemployment
insurance and reduced school lunches. I used to say similar things, but
in such a catastrophic recession isn’t the government supposed to help? Isn’t that the lesson of the Great Depression?
Through
all the turmoil, the presidential election went ahead. Although I
didn’t vote for him, I wept when Barack Obama took the oath of office in
early 2009. They were tears of bewilderment, joy, pride and hope,
despite the fact that I did everything within my own limited power to
keep the moment from ever happening.
From the ashes of the
election rose the movement that pushed me from convinced libertarian
into bunny-hugging liberal. The Tea Party monster forever tainted the
words freedom and libertarian for me. The rise of the Tea Party made me
want to puke, and my nausea is now a chronic condition.
There are a
lot of libertarians in the Tea Party, but there are also a lot of
repugnant, religious nuts and intolerant racists. “Birthers” found a
comfy home among 9-11 conspiracy people and other crackpots. After only a
few months, I had absolutely no desire to ever be linked to this group
of people.
As evidence, I offer the most repugnant example of many
complaints. I’ve heard the n-word used in casual conversation from
people I would never expect. Some people might not believe it or think
I’m playing the race card, but I’m not. I’ve heard the word more than I
care to admit and more often in the run-up to the 2012 election. Perhaps
because I’m a big, fat and bald white guy with a mean goatee, racists
think I’m on board with them. I am not, and I’m ashamed to admit that my
cowardice at confronting this ugliness makes me complicit.
During
Obama’s first term, I also went to graduate school for creative writing
at progressive college, and I settled into my marriage with my wife, a
Canadian and “goddamn liberal.” I can’t point to just one thing that
pushed me left, but in Obama’s first term I had a change of heart,
moving from a lifelong extreme into the bosom of conventional
liberalism.
I began to think about real people, like my neighbors
and people less lucky than me. Did I want those people to starve to
death? I care about children, even poor ones. I love the National Park
system. The best parts of the America I love are our communities. My
libertarian friends might call me a fucking commie (they have) or a
pussy, but extreme selfishness is just so isolating and cruel.
Libertarianism is unnatural, and the size of the federal government is
almost irrelevant. The real question is: what does society need and how
do we pay for it?
A month before the 2012 election, I changed my
party affiliation to Democrat. I am a very late bloomer, that it took me
so many decades to develop my own values. I was thirty-nine.
I
don’t think regular Americans have any idea just how crazy libertarians
can be. The only human corollary I can offer is unquestioning religious
fervor, and hell yeah, I used to be a true believer. Libertarians think
they own the word “freedom,” but it’s a word that often obfuscates more
than enlightens. If you believe the Johann Wolfgang von Goethe quote
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they
are free,” then libertarians live in a prison of their own ideology.
After Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch, with Revenue Secretary
Rick Chandler, launched a series of rountable discussions on tax reform,
Gov. Scott Walker, who asked them to conduct the discussions, suggested
that maybe the state income tax should be eliminated.
Why
was that a surprise? Well, because the discussions were between
Republican officials and business leaders. The public and press were not
invited. Kleefisch explained to the Beloit Daily News that, "people aren’t as candid when there are cameras and reporters in the room.”
A
number of in-state folks have been appalled by the exclusion of the
public from discussion on a subject that could profoundly affect their
pocketbooks.
For instance, on Dec. 15 the LaCrosse Tribune editorialized:
"Closed meetings are simply poor public policy ... while we may not all
contribute to political candidates or align ourselves with political
parties, we all pay taxes."
But now the exclusion of the public
from the discussion has attracted attention from out of state. On
Friday, Forbes contributor and tax analyst Cara Griffith took note of
the process and had this to say:
“Perhaps
Kleefisch didn’t think this all the way through because closing the
discussions was a bad decision. First, it sends the message that the
administration is willing to let business leaders drive tax reform.
While business leaders and trade associations should be vital
contributors to a dialogue about tax reform, the discussion should not
specifically exclude the public or the press.”
She concludes her column with this:
“[C]losing
the meetings sets the precedent that it is acceptable to have meetings
behind closed doors and that it’s acceptable to pick and choose who has a
voice in the tax reform debate. Walker and his administration should
know better.”
Come
2014, these five ambitious Senate hopefuls might storm their way onto
Capitol Hill and change the Republican Party, with Ted Cruz as their
hero.
If Ted Cruz seems like a one-of-a-kind, give it time. A
slew of young, hard-charging, Tea Party-endorsed Senate wannabes is
looking to knock off the Republican establishment again in 2014. Some
have better chances than others, but all have the unmistakable Cruzian
commitment to refusing to toe the Republican Party line and make
headlines while doing it. If you haven’t heard of them yet, you will. Chris McDaniel
Of
all of the upstarts challenging Republican senators in 2014, something
about Chris McDaniel makes him stand out from the rest. It may be his
way of speaking, sort of Ted Cruz-meets-Joel Osteen-meets-Bill Clinton, a
folksy, freedom-loving, doom filled warning for Mississippians that
their way of life is disappearing on Thad Cochran’s watch. “The Republic
is in trouble,” he said when he announced his run for the Senate. “You sense it. Millions of people feel like strangers in their land.”
The
41-year-old state senator also stands out for the support he’s gotten
from Washington-based conservative groups at odds with the Senate
Republican leadership. Within hours of Cochran’s announcement that he’d
run for reelection, McDaniel had picked up endorsements from the Club
for Growth, FreedomWorks, Senate Conservatives Fund, Tea Party Express,
and The Madison Project, making him the only candidate so far to receive
all five.
Finally, as a lawyer and former nationally-syndicated
talk radio host, McDaniel also stands out for the whistle-clean blows he
delivers to anything he says isn’t expressly granted by the
Constitution. Obamacare? “Kill the bill,” he told AFR Talk Radio. Increase the debt ceiling? “No chance.” His approach to legislating in Mississippi and D.C.? “No compromises, no surrenders.”
The
Madison Project calls McDaniel the easiest challenger to get behind in
2014, in part because of his “uninfringeable desire to storm the
castle,” a quality that could help him fit right in alongside
now-veteran castle-stormers Cruz, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee if he makes it
to D.C. Milton Wolf
This 42-year-old radiologist is another
favorite of Tea Party activists, in part because of the irony that the
conservative doctor, who is running on an anti-Obamacare platform, is
also a distant cousin of President Obama’s Kansas family.
With
that distinction to his name, the one-time Rice County cow-milking
champion is now running in the GOP primary against three-term incumbent
Sen. Pat Roberts, a plain-talking conservative himself whom Wolf tags as
insufficiently willing to go up against the party leadership when
circumstances demand it.
In a column for Breitbart.com titled, “Sorry GOP, ‘R’ is Not Enough,”
Wolf slammed Republicans, including Roberts, for “being complicit with
tax hikes, earmark spending, endless borrowing, and debt ceiling
increases.”
Wolf, who has been endorsed by the Senate Conservatives Fund and Madison Project, told Pajamas media
that he’s a reluctant rebel against the machine. “I wish I didn’t have
to do this … Our party let the country down.” But he added that Ted
Cruz inspired him to believe Republicans can be different. “I was so
proud of him, to see him in that 21-hour filibuster, that gave me great
hope.” Ben Sasse
Despite having degrees from Harvard
(undergrad) and Yale (Ph.D.), a job as the country’s youngest college
president, and a resume full of tours in the George W. Bush
administration, Sasse (pronounced Sass) describes himself as a “right-wing conservative.” The Weekly Standard
calls the polished 41-year old a “virtuoso,” while a number of Tea
Party groups, including the Senate Conservatives Fund, have picked him
as their favorite to replace the retiring Nebraska senator Mike Johanns
in the crowded GOP primary.
Even with all of those accolades to
his name, it may be his inadvertent feud with Senate Minority Leader
Mitch McConnell that has endeared Sasse the most to right-of-center
activists, who see Sasse as a potential ideas factory along the lines of
Paul Ryan (“but more conservative,” says one), who has also endorsed
him. After producing a campaign video calling on “every Republican in
Washington, starting with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, to show some
actual leadership,” Sasse reportedly got an earful from McConnell and
his aides at a Washington meet-and-greet. Although neither has confirmed
the row, the episode has become the stuff of legend for activists
looking for a few good men to take on The Man. Joe Miller
If
Joe Miller looks familiar, he should. The 46-year-old Yale-trained
lawyer and West Point grad ran for and won Alaska’s GOP primary in 2010,
defeating incumbent Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski on a wave of Tea
Party energy and a Sarah Palin endorsement. But Miller became the first
Senate nominee in more than 50 years to lose the subsequent general
election to a write-in candidate: Lisa Murkowski.
Miller is back
again for a 2014 GOP primary, this time to take on Democratic incumbent
Sen. Mark Begich. If he makes it to Washington this time, Miller says he
would join what he considers the “Liberty Caucus” helmed by Ted Cruz.
“I would absolutely be hand-in-hand with both he and Mike Lee, Rand Paul
and the work that they’re doing.”
Democrats
are quietly crossing their fingers for a Miller victory in the primary,
believing that any Tea Partier who managed to lose in Tea Party-fueled
2010 will be a sure thing to lose again. Miller’s ill-fated general
election run was marred by disorganization, highlighted by a bizarre
episode in which Miller’s private security firm handcuffed a reporter
for The Alaska Dispatch, an online news site, when the reporter tried to question Miller at a town hall meeting. Matt Bevin
If
any Washington pol embodies Goliath for the Tea Partiers’ vision of
their Davidian struggle against the powers that be, it’s Senate Minority
Leader Mitch McConnell, the googly-eyed yet ruthless power broker who
is up for reelection in his home state of Kentucky. Enter Matt Bevin,
the 46-year-old businessman who runs his family’s bell company and
announced this year he would take on McConnell in the state’s GOP
primary. Although Bevin has struggled to make a major impact in either
fundraising or polling since his announcement,
national Tea Partiers and the Senate Conservatives Fund have
nonetheless flocked to Bevin’s candidacy as a way to push McConnell to
the right and successfully keep the renowned dealmaker on the sidelines
of his own leadership.
Even
if Bevin fails to pick McConnell off in the primary, he will have
succeeded as part of a Tea Party strategy to support a challenge, any
challenge, to a Republican incumbent as a way to keep GOPers on notice
that the days of Republican lawmakers running unnoticed and unopposed
are over.
Alabama State Sen. Jerry Fielding (R) announced Monday that he will
introduce a resolution honoring "Duck Dynasty" star Phil Robertson, who
was suspended from the A&E reality television show after making controversial anti-gay comments in an interview with GQ magazine, the Daily Home reported.
"Phil Robertson's family values are shared by the vast majority of
Alabamians, who are rightfully concerned by the vitriol aimed at his
Christian stance," Fielding said in a statement. "There's a clear double
standard in the media favoring a liberal worldview. When it's used to
silence and punish Christians for stating their beliefs, that's when we
must defend the rights of individuals to exercise their free speech
without fear of politically-motivated repercussion. I join thousands
across Alabama and our country by standing with Phil Robertson, and urge
A&E to reverse their action against him."
The senator will introduce the resolution on Jan. 14 when the state Senate convenes for the next session.
In the resolution, Fielding lauds Robertson and his family as
"ambassadors of the love and grace of the Heavenly Father through their
exemplary lives on and off the camera."
from Americablog
Jesus as you’ve always known him, now with more capitalism. I thought this video was fun, and totally timely.
The creator is Mark Fiore, who writes:
Amidst the imagined attacks on Christmas, Rush Limbaugh
and some Fox News characters accused Pope Francis of being Marxist after
he said some critical words about our economic system. Never mind that
Pope Benedict had similar complaints. Everything has been coming up Pope Francis lately, who was picked as Time’s “Person of the Year” and was featured on the cover of the New Yorker.
Having been raised Catholic and having done plenty of cartoons about
the scandals in the Catholic Church, I’m happy that we’re talking again
about things like helping the poor, imagine that.
“Go, sell your possessions, and use the money to . . . start a growing, profitable business! Come, follow me.”
“The love of money is at the root of all . . . successful entrepreneurs!”
“If they’re hungry, sell them something to eat.”
And my personal favorite:
“Verily, the first shall be first and the last, last. Why do you think they’re called first and last?”
More where that came from. The film is a nice take on the war on Christmas. Happy Season, all. May yours be merry and bright.
GP
To follow or send links: @Gaius_Publius
_______
About author
Gaius Publius is a professional writer living on the West Coast of the
United States. He is Contributing Editor at Americablog.com and working
on several book-length projects, including two on global warming and the
coming climate crisis.
Late on Thursday evening, President Obama and the First Lady issued a
statement to those celebrating Kwanzaa. This was consistent with their
statements this holiday season for Christmas and Hanukkah. Considering
that anywhere from 2 to 5 million people in this country alone observe
and celebrate the holiday, and both the President and FLOTUS are
African American, it should be both uncontroversial and expected for
POTUS to make a statement.
The official statement from the White House was this:
"Michelle and I extend our best wishes to all those celebrating Kwanzaa this holiday season." —President Obama
— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) December 26, 2013
Michelle and I extend our best wishes to all those
celebrating Kwanzaa this holiday season. Today marks the beginning of
the week-long celebration of African American culture through family
activities and community festivities that bring attention to Kwanzaa’s
seven principles of unity, self-determination, collective work and
responsibility, cooperative economics, purpose, creativity, and faith.
Though each principle represents the essence of this holiday, they also
represent the shared values that bind us as Americans.
As families and communities across our country come together today to
light the Kinara, our family sends our hopes for a prosperous and
healthy new year.
For the most part, there was not much outrage from the right
regarding this press release and tweet. But, it wasn’t for lack of
trying by the right-wing’s favorite troll, Ann Coulter. Around the same
time that the President was releasing his statement, Coulter posted an article to her website
where she decided to explain the ‘true’ origins of Kwanzaa. Basically,
it is all the result of the FBI and CIA mixed with ’60s counterculture
sprinkled with Marxism and collectivism. Basically, another liberal plot
to bring down our society as we know it.
For anyone that knows Coulter, this is pretty much her shtick. She
must demonize and whip up a frenzy about anything that can considered
liberal or progressive. And, as is typical of her, when it comes to
matters of race, especially African-Americans, she needs to make sure to
‘whitesplain’ everything to them. In this case, it is about Kwanzaa.
The very worst part of the article, and what Coulter will obviously
defend as ‘humor’ or ‘sarcasm’, came at the very end. After pointing out
(without any shred of evidence) that Kwanzaa is ‘celebrated exclusively
by idiot white liberals’ and that blacks in America only celebrate
Christmas (because, of course, SHE KNOWS), she provided this nice little
‘song’ that is supposed to be sung to the tune of Jingle Bells:
Kwanzaa bells, dashikis sell
Whitey has to pay;
Burning, shooting, oh what fun
On this made-up holiday!
Much like everything that Coulter writes or says, it is all just a
confused word salad of jumbled ideas that is searching for an
all-encompassing theory about why liberalism is bad. When she is called
on her BS, she dismisses it out of hand as just dumb liberals just not
‘getting it.’ The same goes when someone points out a blatantly racist
or bigoted statement she has made. She always takes the Rush Limbaugh
defense. Essentially, she said it in a humorous context and overly
sensitive PC-types are making too much of it.
This will be the case here. That is, if anyone even cares. In the
end, Coulter has gone so far down the rabbit hole that even
conservatives tend to not listen to her anymore. She is so one-note and
absurd that she has a tough time finding anyone other than Fox News to
bring her on. And even with Fox News, you can tell most of the hosts
don’t take her seriously anymore. She has gone well past her expiration
date but nobody on the right has been able to tell her its over.
Instead, they just stop picking up the phone.
Ann Coulter Trolls With Racist Article As President Obama Wishes a Happy Kwanzaa was written by Justin Baragona for PoliticusUSA.