Thursday, May 7, 2015

Chuck Norris, Louis Gohmert and other Texans adamantly refuse to believe that Obama isn’t invading their state


Chuck Norris, Louis Gohmert and other Texans adamantly refuse to believe that Obama isn’t invading their state

Chuck Norris and his fellow conspiracy theorists are modern day Benjamin Franklins, says Chuck Norris


Chuck Norris, Louis Gohmert and other Texans adamantly refuse to believe that Obama isn't invading their state
Conspiracy theorists, right-wing radio buffs and conservative icons are still working themselves into a lather about Operation Jade Helm 15, a months-long military exercise slated for later this summer in multiple states, including Texas.
As previously reported here at Salon, Jade Helm alarmists believe that that the United States military is collaborating with Walmart to “acclimatize Americans to the sight of troops on the street” and “prepare for civil unrest in America.” The conspiracy may have originated with Infowars’ Alex Jones, but it has migrated into the halls of power — especially in Texas, where Governor Greg Abbott (R) and Senator Ted Cruz (R) have both voiced their reservations about the exercise.
Not to be outdone by his colleague in the Senate, Texas Representative Louie Gohmert released a statement saying that his office “has been inundated with calls referring to the Jade Helm 15 military exercise scheduled to take place between July 15 and September 15, 2015,” and that “[t]his military practice has some concerned that the U.S. Army is preparing for modern-day martial law. Certainly, I can understand these concerns.”
Gohmert says he can “understand” the concerns of these Texans because the Obama administration has made it abundantly clear that the “major threats to the country include those who support the Constitution, are military veterans, or even ‘cling to guns or religion,’ patriotic Americans.” He was also “appalled” to discover a map detailing where the exercise would take place, because “the hostile areas amazingly have a Republican majority, ‘cling to their guns and religion,’ and believe in the sanctity of the United States Constitution.”
Former Texas Governor Rick Perry tried to split hairs, saying that he understands why Abbott, Cruz and Gohmert are concerned — they don’t trust the Obama administration — but that “the military is something else” and deserves the benefit of the doubt. Former Texas Ranger — at least on television — Chuck Norris would brook no call to reason, however, as he compared himself and fellow conspiracy theorists to Benjamin Franklin in his most recent World Net Daily column.
“To those who merely think we should check our brains at the door of the White House and trust what the government does,” he wrote, “I would reiterate to you the words of one of our government’s primary founders, Benjamin Franklin, who said, “Distrust and caution are the parents of security. But then again, I’m sure some today would accuse Franklin of being conspiratorial, too!”
As Rachel Maddow explained last night, the problem for the Republican Party is that “this is one of those issues that is hilarious to the real world, but is totally serious business in Republican world.”
“To most Republican politicians,” she continued, “particularly those competing for the Republican presidential nomination, where only Republican base voters will decide who’s allowed to run, if you have a choice between ‘seeming insane to normal people’ and ‘seeming righteous to the base,’ which are you going to pick?”
“There’s an incentive to pick ‘seeming righteous to the base’ even if it is seeming nutty to everybody else,” Maddow concluded.
Watch the entire segment from the Rachel Maddow Show via MSNBC below.

Friday, May 1, 2015

New ACLU Cellphone App Automatically Preserves Video of Police Encounters

New ACLU Cellphone App Automatically Preserves Video of Police Encounters

Jon Wiener on May 1, 2015 - 11:00AM ET

Stop or I'll Shoot!
mage courtesy Lalo Alcaraz. ©2015 (Lalo Alcaraz/Universal Uclick)

The ACLU in California today released a free smart-phone app that allows people to send cellphone videos of police encounters to the ACLU, automatically—and the ACLU will preserve the video footage, even if the cops seize the phone and delete the video or destroy the phone. The app, "Mobile Justice CA," works for both iPhones and Android users. It's available at Apple's App Store and at Google Play.
The app features a large red "Record" button in the middle of the screen. When it's pressed, the video is recorded on the phone and a duplicate copy is transmitted simultaneously to the ACLU server. When the "stop" button is pressed, a "Report" screen appears, where information about the location of the incident and the people involved can also be transmitted to the ACLU. The video and the information are treated as a request for legal assistance and reviewed by staff members. No action is taken by the ACLU, however, unless an explicit request is made, and the reports are treated as confidential and privileged legal communications. The videos, however, may be shared by the ACLU with the news media, community organizations or the general public to help call attention to police abuse.
The app is available in English and Spanish. It includes a "Know Your Rights" page.
The value of the Mobile Justice app was dramatized this month in the Los Angeles suburb of South Gate, where a bystander taped cops detaining people in her neighborhood. A second person was recording her, and in that video, a lawman rushes at the first woman, grabs her cell phone, and smashes it on the floor. The second video ended up on YouTube. (South Gate police later said the officer was not a local cop but rather a deputy US marshal.)
Meanwhile in Texas, a proposed law would make it a crime for ordinary people to videotape police actions—on the grounds that it was "interference" with police activity. In California, on the other hand, the state senate this month approved legislation providing clear legal protection to people who videotape police activity without interfering with investigations.
"People who historically have had very little power in the face of law enforcement now have this tool to reclaim their power and dignity," said Patrisse Cullors, director of the Truth and Reinvestment Campaign at the Ella Baker Center, which is working with the ACLU of California to support the launch of the Mobile Justice CA app. "Our vision is that this app will ultimately help community members connect and organize to respond to incidents of law enforcement violence, and then share their experiences and knowledge with others."
The Mobile Justice CA app complies with California law. ACLU affiliates in other states have developed other versions for use in those states: residents of New York should use the "Stop and Frisk Watch" app; in New Jersey, it's the "Police Tape" app; in Oregon and Missouri it's the "Mobile Justice" app. These work in different ways: with the New York app, shaking the phone stops the filming; the New Jersey app does not transmit the video automatically—the user must choose to send it to the ACLU-NJ for backup storage. Not all of them are available on all platforms and not all are available in Spanish, as the California app is. However, video submitted from anywhere via the California app will be stored and available to those who submitted it, an ACLU SoCal official said. (I'm a board member of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, where the app was funded through donations by Susan Adelman and Claudio Llanos and their family foundation.)
"This app will help serve as a check on abuse," said Hector Villagra, executive director of the ACLU of Southern California (ACLU SoCal), where the app was developed. It will "allow ordinary citizens to record and document any interaction with law enforcement," he said, including "police officers, sheriff's deputies, border patrol, or other officials."

http://www.alternet.org/media/bill-moyers-weapons-mass-distraction-why-media-most-americans-consume-harmful-public-health

Friday, April 24, 2015

Fact check of the news updated

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/article/2015/apr/22/checking-our-tv-network-scorecards/

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Harvard Study Reveals that All Homophobic People are Gay

 April 16, 2015
www.youreadygrandma.com
Harvard Study Reveals that All Homophobic People are Gay


A shocking, double-blind study released by Harvard, in collaboration with MIT, has revealed that all people who are homophobic are actually homosexuals themselves. The study, which was carried out over the course of 5 years and involved nearly 5,000 male subjects, is being accepted by the American Psychological Association as being “scientifically irrefutable.”
This lengthy, intricate study was conducted by the folks at the Harvard Center for Brain Science and incorporated proven Penis Responsiveness Technology (PRT) and Brainwave Function Reading (BFR)  from leading scientists from the Biomimetic Robotics Lab at MIT.
The Penis Responsiveness Technology was created from an offshoot program with the Meshworm Soft Robotics sleeve which was fitted around each of the subjects’ penises. It is capable of measuring blood flow, responsive twitches, and swelling. Meanwhile, Brainwave Function Reading system was set up with diodes attached to the different parts of the skull to read emotional responses in each part of the brain as stimuli was taken in by each subject.
Test subjects were then shown pictures of gay males in various affectionate scenarios of increasingly sexual nature.
“We began with hand holding, cuddling, and kissing,” said head researcher Maxwell Kow. “Without fail, each and every person in the study who strongly expressed a dislike of LGBT individuals in the intake survey always had brain activity that showed feelings of confusion and arousal,” stated Kow. “This was inevitably coupled with physical arousal to various degrees, but it was always significant enough to definitively show that they have a desire to be intimate with the same sex.”
The study also showed a direct, positive correlation between the degree of homophobia expressed in a subject’s survey and the decreased time it took the individual to reach full arousal.