Showing posts with label Perry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Perry. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Rick Perry Calls New Abortion Ruling ‘A Threat to Men’s Rights’

Rick Perry Calls New Abortion Ruling ‘A Threat to Men’s Rights’ 

Written by Justin Dodd October 29th 2013

(Photo Credit: CNNAUSTIN, Texas — Texas Gov. Rick Perry has called a judge’s ruling on the restrictive new abortion law passed last July by the Texas legislature “a threat to men’s rights as keepers of women.”

U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel yesterday assessed two controversial provisions of the law, striking down the requirement that abortion providers have admitting privileges at hospitals within 30 miles of their clinics, but upholding the restrictions on a physician’s ability to offer nonsurgical abortions unless the mother’s health or life is at risk.

Yeakel’s decision enables dozens of Texas clinics that would have been forced to close under the original law to stay open.

The Texas attorney general’s office had argued that the law protects women and the life of the fetus, but Gov. Perry said in a statement that the law was also intended to “protect the rights of men who want to keep guard over their childbearing partners.”

“We will continue fighting to implement the laws passed by the duly-elected officials of our state, laws that reflect the will and values of Texans. Yeakel’s decision is a threat to men’s rights as keepers of women and their role as family protectors,” read the statement.

Perry argued that one of the reasons Texas is “losing its grip” on pro-life legislation is that “too much emphasis has been placed on women’s rights” and said abortion should “also be looked at as a men’s rights issue.”

“Every man who has had relations with a woman has a right to protect his family, and that means limiting a physician’s ability to impose abortion on would-be fathers.”

Perry even went so far as to claim that “abortion destroys a man’s ability to be a man,” which “could leave some men to turn to homosexuality, because neither way is he going to be able to have a child.”

The American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood issued a joint statement declaring the decision a “partial victory,” but also admitted that they’re “no longer clear on exactly which laws we’re fighting for and what they mean.”

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Wendy Davis Hit With TX Voter ID Law, Forced To Sign Affidavit To Vote

Wendy Davis Hit With TX Voter ID Law, Forced To Sign Affidavit To Vote

  By Laurie Bertram Roberts on October 29, 2013

First, it was the Texas District Judge Sandra Watts who, after voting for the past five decades, was almost barred  from voting Oct 22nd. Now it’s gubernatorial candidate state Senator Wendy Davis who had difficulty voting  thanks to the state’s new, strict voter ID law. The law kicked in Tues. Oct. 22 just in time for the start of early voting in Texas’ November 5 election.
What is the big problem that caused Wendy Davis to need to sign an affidavit in addition to showing ID to exercise her constitutional right to vote?  Her driver’s license has her name as Wendy Russell Davis but voter registration records listed her as Wendy Davis.  So that wasn’t good enough according to the new law because the names have to be exactly the same.
The Texas Secretary of State’s office says that if the name on the photo ID doesn’t match exactly but is  “substantially similar” to the name on the registered voters’ list, a voter will be permitted to vote as long as the voter signs an affidavit stating that the voter is the same person on the list of registered voters.
If poll workers deem that the ID and listed name are close enough then the person can vote, but is required to sign an affidavit stating they are who they say they are like Senator Davis did. Senator Davis and other Democrats are concerned that women who have IDs that don’t match exactly due to marriage, divorce, or some other name change will need to go home and get additional documentation or will simply be turned away from the polls.
Davis said:
That’s my greatest concern — that women will show up to vote [and] they’ll be turned away because they don’t have that documentation and that women will be disenfranchised as a consequence of the interpretation of the voter ID law as it’s been applied.
According to the Tarrant County elections supervisor, Steve Raborn, extra documentation shouldn’t be necessary.
Even changes of name for whatever reason — marriage or divorce — they can use things like the address, and date of birth and the photo to verify the identity, so we aren’t expecting any difficulty.
The concerns of Senator Davis and others are not unfounded. The new Texas voter ID law is set to disenfranchise several groups including minorities, senior citizens, college students, and women. The effect of disenfranchising Texas women right now after the large fight over abortion rights in the state is significant.
In a recent their piece, The War on Voting is a War on Women, Barbara Arnwine and Eleanor Smeal point out that of all the groups set to be disenfranchised by voter ID bills women, are the ones impacted the most.
What is not commonly known, however, is that women are among those most affected by voter ID laws. In one survey, 66% of women voters had an ID that reflected their current name, according to the Brennan Center. The other 34% of women would have to present both a birth certificate and proof of marriage, divorce, or name change in order to vote, a task that is particularly onerous for elderly women and costly for poor women who may have to pay to access these records.
According to Time.com:
The state has implemented extended hours and deployed mobile units to make getting election ID easier.  Yet, as of last week, just  41 people across the state had been issued with the cards, the Dallas Morning News reports. An estimated 1.4 million eligible voters in the state do not have the proper IDs to vote.
Where does that leave female Texas voters? If you have the proper documentation to get an ID you may or may not be able to obtain one. These hurdles are made more complex if you are a naturalized citizen, lack transportation, are disabled, or a  transgender woman. This seems like a lot to put American citizens through when voter fraud is less likely than a UFO sighting.
Edited/Published by: SB
Laurie Bertram RobertsAbout the Author:
Laurie Bertram Roberts (17 Articles)
Laurie Bertram Roberts is the president of Mississippi NOW, a feminist activist, full spectrum doula and writer in Jackson, MS. She is passionate about reproductive justice and fighting oppression. When not smashing patriarchy she is likely watching Doctor Who, Star Trek or engaging in other nerdy activities with her seven homeschooled kids.

 http://www.liberalamerica.org/2013/10/29/wendy-davis-vote-affidavit/

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Texas to Ban Gynecology


Texas to Ban Gynecology

 Tea Party Cat

Texas to ban gynecologyTexas Gov. Rick Perry announced he was calling another special session so that the legislature could “pass a ban on the corrupt teaching and practice of gynecology, as well as banning women being licensed as doctors.”
Gov. Perry said that he was disappointed at the resistance he got for the abortion ban in June and July, and that he felt that it would’ve gone smoothly “if women’s heads weren’t filled with nonsense by women doctors and gynecologists.”
In a statement released by his office, he called on the legislature to:
  • Ban the corrupt teaching and practice of gynecology.
  • End the practice of licensing women as doctors in the state.
  • Require the Board of Education to eliminate all mentions of female anatomy or biology from textbooks in the state.
Gov. Perry said that this was another step in his plan to “protect women and their health from any any behavior which might anger God and lead to their eternal damnation in Hell. You’re welcome, ladies.”

Don’t Let Gov’t Play Doctor! Unless you’re a GOP Governor

Don’t Let Gov’t Play Doctor! Unless you’re a GOP Governor

 Lipstick Liberal

Uncle Sam Perry
Radical Left-Wing-Comedy-Conspiracy found at: TIME

 Health Care
Spread Your Legs for Uncle Sam

The real meaning of the creepy new anti-Obamacare ads
By Kate Pickert @katepickertSept. 19, 2013141

   
For all of the political fighting in Washington over defunding the Affordable Care Act, a pair of jarring new anti-Obamacare ads shows that some leading opponents have shifted their focus to sabotaging the law once it’s in place.

The spots feature a creepy, clownish Uncle Sam character performing gynecological and prostate exams on patients who signed up for insurance under the ACA. “Don’t let the government play doctor. Opt out of Obamacare,” the ads tell viewers. Not surprisingly, they’ve gone viral.

The canny bit of marketing is part of a reported $750,000 campaign by Generation Opportunity, an anti-Obamacare group backed by the billionaire conservative donors Charles and David Koch, to convince young adults that their best option is to remain uninsured once the health care law kicks in next year.

What’s most notable about the ads – besides the unfortunately positioned patriotic symbol – is who they target. Young adults are crucial to the ACA’s success. The law’s state-based health insurance marketplaces, called exchanges, will keep premiums affordable only if enough young, healthy people sign up for coverage to offset the cost of insuring older and sicker enrollees. The White House has said the exchanges will need to enroll 2.7 million healthy 18-25-year-olds to remain solvent.

According to Yahoo! News, Generation Opportunity is planning a series of campaigns on college campuses, replete with a game that includes a “Wheel of Misery” and “informative palm cards,” as a counter-effort to groups working to enroll young people in the exchanges. Generation Opportunity’s staff is packed with conservative recent college graduates and some more experienced political hands, including a failed 2012 congressional candidate from Pennsylvania and a former vice president of Americans United for Life.

(MORE: Insane Anti-Obamacare Ad: Creepy Uncle Sam Wants to Probe You)

Some young people could spend less by paying a penalty for not having insurance under Obamacare than what it will cost to buy coverage. But new federal subsidies will dramatically cut the cost of coverage for individuals earning up to about $44,000 per year and low-cost, high-deductible plans often favored by the young and healthy will be available to those under 30. Older Americans, by contrast, will need more comprehensive coverage to avoid paying federal fines for not having insurance.

Persuading younger, generally healthy people that they don’t need insurance is an acknowledgment by conservatives that their only true hope of sinking Obamacare is to try and make it function poorly. House Republicans are poised to pass a stopgap spending measure this week that will tie funds to keep the government running to a measure that would defund Obamacare. With the Senate under Democratic control, the effort amounts to little more than political theater. Campaigns like Generation Opportunity’s represent the real new front in the fight over Obamacare: persuading young people to opt in or out.


Thursday, September 19, 2013

Rick Perry, Martin O'Malley Butt Heads In Obamacare Debate

Rick Perry, Martin O'Malley Butt Heads In Obamacare Debate

 





       
Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) and Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) butted heads in a Wednesday Obamacare debate on the CNN show "Crossfire."
O'Malley and Perry, who have both signaled potential 2016 presidential campaigns, agreed that the health care system is "broken," but disagreed whether Obamacare helps.
"Why would we want to put thousands, tens of thousands of people on a system that's broken?" Perry asked. "It's Washington, D.C., forcing the states to meet all of these standards. And that's why we've said, 'no thank you.'"
O'Malley said the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has been "responsive," and Maryland has received flexibility in implementing the Affordable Care Act.
“You should come to the National Governors Association meetings again,” O’Malley told Perry. "I know Texas seceded from the National Governors Association, but if you came, you might be able to learn from the other governors that are actually implementing [Obamacare], doing it well, and actually doing a better job of supporting an innovation economy and their workers’ well being.”
The disagreement led to a gubernatorial showdown over how to define success.
"The bottom line's gonna be by seeing which of these states succeed as we go into the future," Perry said. "Right now, on job creation, Texas is leading the march."
"On schools and median income, Maryland is leading the march," O'Malley retorted. "On innovation, Maryland is leading the march."

Saturday, September 14, 2013

Saturday, August 24, 2013

RICK PERRY ACCUSED OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION IN VETO OF FUNDS TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC CORRUPTION

Via: The Daily Edge
According to CBS and AP: A Texas judge says he plans to have a special prosecutor review allegations that Governor Rick Perry abused the powers of his office and broke the law in a feud with the DA whose most high-profile case had been the prosecution of convicted GOP money launderer Tom DeLay.
Perry’s office (of course) denies any wrongdoing.
But the facts show that Perry publicly stated he would eliminate $3.7 million in annual state funding if Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg refused to resign following a drunk-driving conviction.
She didn’t. And Perry carried out his threat, ironically cutting funding for state public corruption investigators. All of which amounts to, according to Texans for Public Justice, a violation of Texas laws governing coercion of a public servant, bribery, abuse of official capacity and official oppression.