Showing posts with label negotiations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label negotiations. Show all posts

Monday, November 25, 2013

Cruz, comity, and comedy

Cruz, comity, and comedy

 
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) sat down with Bloomberg News’ Al Hunt the other day, who asked the Republican senator about the “nuclear option.” Alas, the message didn’t match the messenger (via Caitlin MacNeal).
HUNT: Will it complicate passing budgets or debt ceilings or anything?
 
CRUZ: Of course it will. I mean, it will poison the atmosphere of the Senate.
I should note that I’ve only seen the transcript, and therefore have no idea whether the right-wing Texan was able to say this with a straight face.
 
Either way, let’s not forget that this is the same Ted Cruz who helped oversee his party’s government-shutdown strategy. Cruz has repeatedly drawn the ire of his own Republican colleagues who’ve been the targets of his extremist tactics. Cruz won’t endorse his own Senate allies. A “remarkable number” of lawmakers in both parties have come forward “to say that they think Cruz is kind of a jerk.”
 
He’s the guy who wants to talk about poisoning the atmosphere of the Senate? Maybe someone else can take the lead on defending institutional comity?
 

Monday, November 11, 2013

Word of the Day: “NEGOTIATION”


Word of the Day: “NEGOTIATION”

by the Lipstick Liberal at Wink Progress
 

GOP Word of the Day: NegotiationMerriam-Webster Online: a formal discussion between people who are trying to reach an agreement : an act of negotiating
Republican-Fox Online: THREATEN ECONOMIC DISASTER UNLESS; a law that was vetted and made policy through the use of democratically established rules AND judicial law-abiding methods IS DELAYED, DEFUNDED, or REPEALED  -OR- DEMAND EVEN MORE than the $217 Billion dollars in spending cuts, that Democrats have already conceded too.


Examples:  When a Husband tells his wife “she is the reason”, he is FORCED to smack her. SEE Ike Turner, O.J. Simpson and Chris Brown
Exceptions: Republican use only! Democrats are NOT ALLOWED to use for immigration, WIC Programs or anything that is deemed to help those who need it the most.

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Disbelief to relief: World greets US budget deal

Disbelief to relief: World greets US budget deal

Everyone take a breath: Worldwide relief greets US budget deal as default fears ease

 

World welcomes US budget deal but fears remainLONDON (AP) -- The world's disbelief at the political impasse in the U.S. turned to relief Thursday as the country stepped back from the brink of default. But experts and foreign officials warned that Washington's credibility had been damaged — a point President Barack Obama echoed.
The deal may assure only a few months of financial order, and the prospect of another possible crisis early next year when the agreement lapses leaves many wondering about the stability of U.S. global leadership.
Nicholas Kitchen, a political scientist at the London School of Economics, said the shutdown had tarnished the reputation of the U.S.
"In showing itself to be unable to even run its own affairs competently the U.S. in some sense surrenders claims to global leadership," he said. "It's difficult to tell other people how to run their affairs when you can't keep your own house in order."
He said that when countries look successful, other countries look to follow their lead.
"The U.S. is not doing a very good job at the moment in showing itself to be a model of good governance," he said.
Still, he said the crisis isn't likely to have a long-term impact on U.S. influence, despite the embarrassment of Obama having to cancel a long-planned trip to Asia to deal with the impasse at home.
British Labour Party legislator Ann Clwyd said she and other members of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee were watching closely because of a planned official trip to Washington in two weeks' time — they wouldn't be traveling if the government remained shuttered.
She said her time in the European Parliament, where budget shutdowns have happened more than once, convinced her that a last-minute settlement was likely. But she feared that Obama's health care plan might be gutted as part of a deal with the Republicans.
"The fact that that didn't happen is very positive," she said. "I very much hoped that would survive."
Clwyd said the credibility of the U.S. was only slightly damaged by the prolonged shutdown, since it was resolved in time to avert financial disaster. But she said the U.S. has in recent months been failing to provide leadership on difficult Middle East issues, including Syria and the Arab-Israeli conflict.
There was also relief in Brussels at the heart of the European Union as the U.S. stepped back from the brink.
Simon O'Connor, spokesman for the EU's economic and monetary affairs commissioner Olli Rehn, said a "serious large shadow" that threatened both the global economy and the nascent recovery in Europe has been lifted with the resolution of the debt ceiling crisis.
"That's very good news which we strongly welcome," he said.
Many in Europe enjoyed poking fun at the apparently broken U.S. political system, but the pleasure of laughing at America's troubles seemed to fade as default neared.
The Tea Party movement got short shrift in many quarters, with the Sueddeutsche Zeitung newspaper in Munich, Germany suggesting that Obama was lucky to have such feeble adversaries.
"It is easy to remain the reasonable, serene statesman if you are dealing with concrete-headed , self-righteous nihilists like the Tea Party lawmakers," the influential newspaper said in a commentary. "It is easy to reject all negotiations if the other side acts like a crazy extortionist gang. Obama played the PR -game of guilt and innocence very cleverly. According to the polls, he wins hands down. But that is not the primary task of the president."
The newspaper said Obama had not handled his responsibility as president well despite his apparent victory over the Tea Party.
Xenia Dormandy, director of the Americas program at London's Chatham House, said the U.S. image had suffered a double blow, with both its economic and political credentials called into question
"There is a sense that the U.S. as a reliable ally is not necessarily the case anymore," she said, warning that both American allies and adversaries have reached this conclusion. But she, like others, said the damage is most likely short term.
Politics aside, there were individual signs of relief in many parts of the globe. In the South Korean capital, Seoul, 26-year-old college senior Lee Boo-gun said he thought the U.S. economy had been about to collapse — an event he believed would shortly be felt at his door.
"I thought it would affect Korea's economy," he said. "The U.S. would hit Europe and then it would affect Asia."
He expressed relief that reason had prevailed.
In Israel, a key American ally in the Middle East, commentators said the fight hurt America's overall image even though a deal had been reached before it was too late.
"There is no doubt that damage was done here to the image of American economic stability," Israel's economic envoy to Washington, Eli Groner, told Israel's Army Radio. "It's not good for the financial markets, not in the United States and not around the world."
In Brazil, a large holder of U.S. debt, there was certainly relief, but also concerns that it's just a temporary fix and more turbulence is ahead. Finance Minister Guido Mantega said the U.S. must come to a lasting answer to the "temporary solution" that was found. He added that as long as the threat of another shutdown exists, there will be "a sensation of insecurity, distrust and therefore damage to business in general."
Brazil's biggest newspapers carried headlines like O Globo's "Temporary Relief" and leading economic columnist Miriam Leitao summed up the mood in the daily.
"Nobody won. Everybody lost. The Obama government was held prisoner by blackmail. The Republican party allowed itself to be controlled by a radical minority and no longer represents the average American's way of thinking," Leitao wrote. "The government as a whole lost credibility and today there is more uncertainty surrounding the world economy."
___
AP Business Writers Joe McDonald in Beijing, Kelvin Chan in Hong Kong, Youkyung Lee in Seoul and Kay Johnson in Mumbai and AP Writers Robert Reid in Berlin, Peter Enav in Taipei, Tim Sullivan in New Delhi, Tia Goldenberg in Jerusalem, Bradley Brooks in Sao Paulo and Cassandra Vinograd and Sylvia Hui in London contributed to this report.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Poll: GOP gets the blame in shutdown

Poll: GOP gets the blame in shutdown

 Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans are holding Republicans primarily responsible for the partial government shutdown as public esteem sinks for all players in the impasse, President Barack Obama among them, according to a new poll. It's a struggle with no heroes.
The Associated Press-GfK survey, out Wednesday, affirms expectations by many in Washington — Republicans among them — that the GOP may end up taking the biggest hit in public opinion from the fiscal paralysis, just as that party did when much of the government closed 17 years ago. But the situation is fluid nine days into the shutdown and there's plenty of disdain to go around.
Overall, 62 percent mainly blamed Republicans for the shutdown. About half said Obama or the Democrats in Congress bear much responsibility.
Asked if she blamed Obama, House Republicans, Senate Democrats or the tea party for the shutdown, Martha Blair, 71, of Kerrville, Texas, said, yes, you bet. All of them.
"Somebody needs to jerk those guys together to get a solution, instead of just saying 'no,'" said Blair, an independent. "It's just so frustrating." It's also costly: She's paid to fly with a group to four national parks in Arizona and California next month and says she can't get her money back or reschedule if the parks remain closed.
The poll found that the tea party is more than a gang of malcontents in the political landscape, as its supporters in Congress have been portrayed by Democrats. Rather, it's a sizable — and divisive — force among Republicans. More than 4 in 10 Republicans identified with the tea party and were more apt than other Republicans to insist that their leaders hold firm in the standoff over reopening government and avoiding a default of the nation's debt in coming weeks.
Most Americans disapprove of the way Obama is handling his job, the poll suggests, with 53 percent unhappy with his performance and 37 percent approving of it. Congress is scraping rock bottom, with a ghastly approval rating of 5 percent.
Indeed, anyone making headlines in the dispute has earned poor marks for his or her trouble, whether it's Democrat Harry Reid, the Senate majority leader, or Republican John Boehner, the House speaker, both with a favorability rating of 18 percent.
And much of the country draws a blank on Republican Ted Cruz of Texas despite his 21-hour Senate speech before the shutdown. Only half in the poll were familiar enough with him to register an opinion. Among those who did, 32 percent viewed him unfavorably, 16 percent favorably.
Comparisons could not be drawn conclusively with how people viewed leaders before the shutdown because the poll was conducted online, while previous AP-GfK surveys were done by telephone. Some changes may be due to the new methodology, not shifts in opinion. The poll provides a snapshot of public opinion starting in the third day of the shutdown.
The poll comes with both sides dug in and trading blame incessantly. On Tuesday, a proposal by House Republicans to create a working group of 20 lawmakers to tackle deficit issues prompted a White House veto threat, and a plan by Senate Democrats to raise the debt limit by $1 trillion to avoid a default drew a frosty reception from the GOP. Obama is insisting Republicans reopen government and avert default before any negotiations on deficit reduction or his 2010 health care law are held.
Among the survey's findings:
— Sixty-eight percent said the shutdown is a major problem for the country, including majorities of Republicans (58 percent), Democrats (82 percent) and independents (57 percent).
— Fifty-two percent said Obama is not doing enough to cooperate with Republicans to end the shutdown; 63 percent say Republicans aren't doing enough to cooperate with him.
— Republicans are split on just how much cooperation they want. Among those who do not back the tea party, fully 48 percent say their party should be doing more with Obama to find a solution. But only 15 percent of tea-party Republicans want that outreach. The vast majority of them say GOP leaders are doing what they should with the president, or should do even less with him.
— People seem conflicted or confused about the showdown over the debt limit. Six in 10 predict an economic crisis if the government's ability to borrow isn't renewed later this month with an increase in the debt limit — an expectation widely shared by economists. Yet only 30 percent say they support raising the limit; 46 percent were neutral on the question.
— More than 4 in 5 respondents felt no personal impact from the shutdown. For those who did, thwarted vacations to national parks, difficulty getting work done without federal contacts at their desks and hitches in government benefits were among the complaints.
Blair's nine-day trip to national parks with a tour group won't happen if the parks are still closed next month. "I'm concerned," she said, "but it seems kind of trivial to people who are being shut out of work."
In Mount Prospect, Ill., Barbara Olpinski, 51, a Republican who blames Obama and both parties for the shutdown, said her family is already seeing an impact and that will worsen if the impasse goes on. She's an in-home elderly care director, her daughter is a physician's assistant at a rural clinic that treats patients who rely on government coverage, and her husband is a doctor who can't get flu vaccines for patients on public assistance because deliveries have stopped.
"People don't know how they are going to pay for things, and what will be covered," she said. "Everybody is kind of like holding their wallets."
The AP-GfK Poll was conducted Oct. 3-7 and involved online interviews with 1,227 adults. The survey has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points for all respondents.
The survey used GfK's KnowledgePanel, a probability-based Internet panel designed to be representative of the U.S. population. Respondents to the survey were first selected randomly using phone or mail survey methods, and were later interviewed for this survey online. People selected for KnowledgePanel who didn't have online access were given that access at no cost to them.

GOP Shoots the Hostage


Ron Johnson: Government Shutdown 'Probably Wasn't The Best Strategy'

Ron Johnson: Government Shutdown 'Probably Wasn't The Best Strategy'

 The Huffington Post  |  By

ron johnson government shutdownSen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said Tuesday that trying to defund Obamacare at the expense of a government shutdown may not have been sensible.
"It probably wasn't the best strategy to employ," Johnson, a tea party supporter, said in a CNN interview.
Johnson said defunding Obamacare -- an effort led by his conservative colleague, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) -- was never "achievable," requiring the support of too many Senate Democrats. But he hesitated to explicitly call the showdown, and resulting government shutdown, a mistake.
"I appreciate any effort that really highlights how harmful Obamacare is going to be," Johnson said.
Johnson is among the Republicans in Congress who believe the debt ceiling deadline, if breached, won't cause economic catastrophe, as many economists and the Treasury Department have forewarned. Johnson said there's "no reason" for the U.S. to default.
"A responsible administration, a responsible president, wouldn't try and scare the markets," Johnson said. "He would be calming markets. The treasury secretary should be calming markets, saying, 'Guys, we have more than enough tax revenue coming in.' There's no reason for the U.S. to default on its debt at all."

10 most appalling comments from the right — just this week

10 most appalling comments from the right — just this week 

A Republican congressman actually argued that Obamacare is as bad as the Fugitive Slave Act 

This article originally appeared on Alternet.
AlterNet
1. On Fox TV, it is assumed that the Nicaraguan meteorologist knows all about tacos.
It’s fairly obvious by now that Fox News is a place where being offensive and ignorant is not just permitted, but encouraged. For example: How much fun is it to make fun of someone’s ethnic heritage inaccurately? So much fun. In an exchange that is indistinguishable from schoolyard bullying and outright nincompoop-ism, Fox News host Brian Kilmeade on Friday said he assumed that the network’s Latina meteorologist “grew up on tacos,” because she is from a Spanish-speaking country, and of course, they are all the same.
Being the multi-ethnic bastion that it is, Fox & Friends featured a segment on making tacos to celebrate National Taco Day. Kilmeade turned to Fox News Weather team member Maria Molina, who was born in Nicaragua and grew up in South Florida and asked, “So what are the tips we need to know? You grew up on tacos, correct?”
“No, I did not grow up on tacos!” Molina snapped. “I’m Nicaraguan. It’s not a native food.”
Does she really think that these people are educable?
2. Poor Ted Cruz: first a Republican “lynch mob” is after him, and then Democrats hurt his feelings.
Some Republicans are very mad at Ted Cruz, whose antics against Obamacare spiraled into the impasse that became the government shutdown, which is beginning to play very badly for the GOP. So on Wednesday, a group of Senate Republicans, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, railed against Cruz at a private luncheon, according to theNew York Times. Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire and Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin were there as well, and some of these senators became very angry with Cruz’s intransigence, and lit into him. An unnamed senator described the scene thusly to the Times: “It just started a lynch mob.”
Lynch mob is a term that is being tossed around rather cavalierly these days, if you ask us. But then a lot of racially loaded terms are flying during the Obama administration, and anyone who thinks that is an accident is a fool. (See next item.)
Poor Ted Cruz was feeling really picked on all week, and not just by his own party. Democrats, he said at week’s end, are portraying him as the “root of all evil in the world.” How could they, when really everyone knows that Obamacare, or affordable healthcare, is the root of all evil in the world?

3. Rep. William O’Brien, R-N.H.: “Obamacare is as bad as Fugitive Slave Act.”
Obamacare, in the conservative echo-sphere, is the worst thing ever to befall mankind, and that is why it must at any cost be prevented, no matter how futile, ridiculous or damaging these actions may be. Rep. William O’Brien joined the anti-Obamacare hysteria this week with his racially tinged analogy comparing Obamacare to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which made it against the law not to return runaway slaves to their owners. Hmmm, wonder why something slavery-related popped into his head to describe the signature legislation of the first black president.
Here’s how he justified his offensive comparison to the Manchester Union Leader: “Just as the Fugitive Slave Act was an overreach by the federal government, so too we understand that Obamacare is an assault on the rights of individuals.”
Oh, so nothing racial about it at all.
4. Rep. Todd Rokita, R-Ind.: Obamacare is the worst law known to man, pretty lady.
Crazed Republicans are really enjoying the attention they are getting what with the shutdown, and how they are saving the world from the abomination of Obamacare. Rep. Todd Nokita took full advantage of his moments in the sun this week, first when he said: “We just want to help the American people to get through one of the most insidious laws created by man, that is Obamacare.”
Please save us, Republican heroes.
Still enjoying the spotlight, Rokita mixed it up with CNN’s Carol Costello later in the week, again defending the shutdown as a small price to pay for saving America from the horror of affordable healthcare. Finally, he gave up on trying to explain this all to Costello, saying, “Carol, you’re beautiful, but you have to be honest as well.”
Mmmm, sexism. That’s hot.
5. Not to be outdone: Bill O’Reilly finally weighs in on Obamacare
It did not seem possible, but Fox News host Bill O’Reilly took fear-mongering to a new level on Thursday when he told viewers to think of President Obama’s healthcare law as a “vicious motorcycle gang” coming for their daughters.
Yeah, that’s right.
“It’s like this,” O’Reilly said. “Your teenager comes to you, saying she wants to attend a dance. You have some misgivings, but you say okay because she’s so passionate about the issue. Then you learn a vicious motorcycle gang may well show up at the dance, so you change your mind based upon best available evidence. And you protect your daughter from possible danger. Obamacare is like that.”
See?
6. Rafael Cruz (yep, Ted’s Dad): Obama’s on the side of the Muslims.
Ted Cruz is not the only member of his family with political aspirations and a talent for crazy talk. Speaking at a GOP rally in Adams County, Colo., Ted’s dad, right-wing pastor Rafael Cruz said: “So Barack Obama said: ‘If the winds shift, I will side with the Muslims.’ McCain couldn’t say that, because it’s not politically correct. It is time to stop being politically correct!”
What he really meant is it’s time to stop being correct at all, or to have your words reflect any sort of reality. That’s what time it is, America.
Then he made some more stuff up:55 million babies have been murdered by abortion since 1973. At the other end, Obamacare, with denying care to the elderly, with care being rationed, with care being postponed for 12 to 18 months, with care being controlled by a group of bureaucrats, that on the basis of cost/benefit, will decide whether you get a medical procedure or not, they’re destroying our end of life. As a matter of fact, one of the things in Obamacare is that the elderly, every five years you must have end-of-life counseling. Translation: suicide counseling!”
Translation: Run, run ye Christians away from this terrible Muslim-imposed healthcare law.
7. Rick Joyner, Christian TV host: Time for God to impose martial law to save us from Obama’s tyranny.
There is only one way out of this pickle, the one imposed by the tyrannical Muslim-in-chief Obama. On his Monday Internet broadcast, Morning Star TV’s Rick Joyner predicted that democracy was “doomed,” doomed I tell you, unless the Lord imposed martial law.
Poor guy worked himself into quite a lather. “We’re headed for serious tyranny, a terrible tyranny right now. But guess what? The kingdom is coming, the Kingdom of God is coming.” And some more stuff, blah blah blah. Then: “That’s why I appeal to the Lord: Don’t let us be totally destroyed, please raise up those who will save us. And as I’ve been telling friends for a long time, no election is going to get the right person in there because the system is so broken.”
Therefore, God must stage a coup. That’s what needs to happen right now.
8. Pat Robertson to elderly woman viewer: It’s your fault your husband’s health his suffering.
Always willing to comfort his flock, Pat Robertson used his “700 Club” pulpit recently to set a woman straight about priorities. Retired and living on a small pension and Social Security pension, the woman was faced with the difficult decision of whether to give money to her church or pay her husband’s medical expenses.
This whole situation is all her fault, Robertson told her. Her husband is sick precisely because her contribution to the church has been inadequate, despite a lifetime of tithing.
“Your husband has all these medical problems because the ‘devour’ has not been rebuked,” Robertson explained. “You need to rebuke him. You give your tithes faithfully and God said, ‘I will rebuke the devour,’ the person that is eating up your money and eating up your health. So you want to be healthy? That’s a promise in the word.”
Comforting words.
9. Pennsylvania officials continue their rich history of offensive same-sex marriage analogies: This week, it’s pets and incest.
Back in August, lawyers for the state of Pennsylvania arguing against a clerk who was issuing same-sex marriage licenses suggested same-sex couples were like 12-year-old children. Governor Tom Corbett, on whose behalf the lawyers were arguing, tried to distance himself from those remarks in the ensuing kerfuffle. This week, on Wednesday, a like-minded county commissioner by the name of Tom Creighton who’s fighting tooth and nail against giving benefits to same-sex couples said: “I don’t feel the county should be looking for new ways to give away taxpayer money. Next it could be giving money out to people’s pets or whatever.”
On Friday, during an interview, Gov. Corbett opened his mouth and stuck his foot deep inside it, saying that while his lawyers’ (for whom taxpayers are paying $400 an hour) comparison of same-sex couples as children was inept, “I think a much better analogy would have been brother and sister, don’t you?” he said.
His interviewer declined to offer her assent, saying she’d leave the comments to “his team.”
By afternoon, Corbett was backpedaling and offering his version of an apology. It turns out he didn’t want to offend anyone, and if he did, he was sorry. He just wanted to give examples of categories of people who are ineligible for marriage.
Oh, okay. That makes it much better.
10. Hatefulness prize-winner of the week: Fox News’ Stuart Varney.
Fox News has been having a rollicking good time with the government shutdown. They think it’s the most wonderful thing. But it’s also the Democrats’ fault. Go figure. The first day of the shutdown, Hannity and friends marveled at how they were not feeling the effects of the shutdown at all. What was the big deal, anyway? Fox Business’ Todd Starnes chortled: “If you believe the Democrats, it’s time to go out and buy the potted meat and Tang and get in your survival bunker.”
Ha ha ha ha. Aren’t people who barely have enough money to eat so funny? And so fun to make fun of?
Later in the week, Varney was not in so good a mood. He was very, very angry, and not chortling anymore. He was angry at the more than 800,000 furloughed federal employees for having the audacity to want their back pay, so angry that he wants to “punish those people.”
“No, I don’t think they should get their back pay, frankly,” he said. “I really don’t. I’m sick and tired of a massive, bloated federal bureaucracy living on our backs, and taking money out of us, a lot more money than most of us earn in the private sector, then getting a furlough, and then getting their money back at the end of it. Sorry, I’m not for that. I want to punish these people. Sorry to say that, but that’s what I want to do.”
Do you think he’s really sorry to say that?

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

‘Furious’ Arizona Lawmaker Compares ‘De Fuhrer’ Obama To Hitler

‘Furious’ Arizona Lawmaker Compares ‘De Fuhrer’ Obama To Hitler

by David Badash on October 8, 2013


Post image for ‘Furious’ Arizona Lawmaker Compares ‘De Fuhrer’ Obama To HitlerArizona state Rep. Brenda Barton is “**FURIOUS**” with President Barack Obama, wrongly blaming him for closing down the National Parks. The Republican yesterday compared the President to Hitler in a Facebook post, and is refusing to back down.
“Someone is paying the National Park Service thugs overtime for their efforts to carry out the order of De Fuhrer,” Barton wrote on Facebook. “… where are our Constitutional Sheriffs who can revoke the Park Service Rangers authority to arrest??? Do we have any Sheriffs with a pair?”
Clearly, the Arizona House member is confused about the law. The U.S. Constitution gives the federal government superiority over state and local governments in Article Six of the United States Constitution, known as the “supremacy clause.”
Also, the word is “Führer” or “Fuehrer.”
“Barton was asked about the post by the Arizona Capitol Times newspaper and said she said was inspired by National Parks Service officers enforcing the government shutdown on federal lands,” Talking Points Memo reports. ”He’s dictating beyond his authority,” Barton added:
“It’s not just the death camps. (Hitler) started in the communities, with national health care and gun control. You better read your history. Germany started with national health care and gun control before any of that other stuff happened. And Hitler was elected by a majority of people,” she said.
Barton also accused the president of trying to maximize the discomfort Americans are feeling as a result of the shutdown, which she described as an “outrageous form of federal imperial government.” She concluded by rejecting the idea she owes Obama an apology for her statements.
“He’s doing something controversial. It’s not controversial that I’m criticizing him,” said Barton.
Regardless, Barton’s legislative accomplishments include sponsoring HCR 2016, a bill that would prevent the state of Arizona from funding any operation related to healthcare that pays for services to “childless adults.” (If passed, the bill would have to go before Arizona voters.)
Barton also sponsored legislation a bill “urging the United States Congress to implement fiscally responsible spending and budget measures, including the proposal of a balanced budget amendment to the united states constitution.”
In April, Barton falsely claimed the “U.S. pays 25% of the costs of the U.N. and yet no American holds a top decision-making post in the U.N.”

 

Republican Nunes blasts rump group of his own party for shutdown

Republican Nunes blasts rump group of his own party for shutdown

House full of lemmings?
Rare is the politician who unloads on members of his own party, but Republican Devin Nunes keeps doing exactly that.
Nunes has already referred to House Republicans who pushed for the government shutdown as the “lemming caucus” for their willingness to follow the lead of Sen. Ted Cruz and other staunch conservatives. He says their strategy is “dumb” and doomed to failure, in an interview with the National Review.
Nunes is not some squishy moderate Republican from a swing district. He’s very conservative on most matters, a stout opponent of Obamacare and fierce critic of the president’s foreign policy. His 2010 book, Restoring the Republic: A Clear, Concise, and Colorful Blueprint for America’s Future, is a sort of manifesto for a conservative movement.
Yet Nunes believes his party is fighting a losing battle and undermining its ability to achieve longer-term objectives such as the rollback of Obamacare and getting the nation’s fiscal house in order.
Asked why he’s speaking out in such strong language, Nunes told NR: “ I’ve got three little kids at home and I’m trying to save this country from itself. I’m not here to play political power games and I’ve had enough of people playing political power games and this has just gone on too long.”
- Jeffry Bartash

Saturday, September 28, 2013

How budget showdowns could squeeze the US economy

How budget showdowns could squeeze the US economy

Here we go again: What impact will Washington's budget fights have on the US economy?

 

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Just as the U.S. economy is struggling to expand at a healthy pace, a pair of political standoffs threatens to slow growth and spook investors.
Unless Congress acts before Tuesday to fund federal spending, some of the government would shut down. Separately, the government will run out of money to pay its bills by late October unless Congress raises the federal borrowing cap. A 2011 fight over the borrowing cap rattled consumers, businesses and investors and likely slowed growth.
Here are questions and answers about how the two standoffs, now intertwined, could affect the economy and financial markets:
  • FILE - This Sept. 27, 2013 file photo, President Barack Obama gestures while making a statement regarding the budget fight in Congress and foreign policy challenges in the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington. Unless Congress acts before Tuesday to fund federal spending, some of the government would shut down. Separately, the government will run out of money to pay its bills by late October unless Congress raises the federal borrowing cap. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)  
  • View Photo FILE - This Sept. 27, 2013 file photo, President
     Barack Obama gestures while making a statement
     regarding the budget fight in Congress and foreign
     policy challenges in the James Brady Press Briefing
     Room of the White House in Washington. Unless
     Congress acts before Tuesday to fund federal spending,
     some of the government would shut down. Separately,
     the government will run out of money to pay its
     bills by late October unless Congress raises the 
    federal borrowing cap. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)

RELATED QUOTES

SymbolPriceChange
BAC13.90-0.18
Q. What exactly will happen within the next days and weeks?
A. The most urgent deadline is for Congress and the White House to agree to keep funding the government after the current budget year ends Monday. Otherwise, some of the government would have to shut down. The House and Senate are considering bills to fund the government past the deadline. But House Republicans want to cut off funding for President Barack Obama's health care law as a condition of passing the spending measure. Senate Democrats and the White House have balked. Unless one side essentially blinks, a partial shutdown of the government will occur.
Q. What would be the effect on the economy if the two sides miss the deadline for passing the spending measure?
A. About one-third of the government will shut down. About 800,000 of about 2.1 million federal employees will be sent home without pay. National parks will close. Passports and visas won't be issued. The Environmental Protection Agency, NASA and other agencies will close.
The military and other agencies involving safety and security would continue to function. These include air traffic controllers, border patrol and law enforcement officers. Social Security, Medicare and veterans' benefits payments would continue, too. New applicants might not be approved, though.
A partial shutdown that lasts no more than a few days wouldn't likely nick the economy much. But if the shutdown were to persist for two weeks or more, the economy would likely begin to slow, economists say.
Extended closures of national parks would hurt hotels, restaurants and other tourism-related businesses. Delays in processing visas for overseas visitors could interrupt trade. And the one-third of the federal workforce that lost pay would cut back on spending, thereby slowing growth.
A three-week shutdown would slow the economy's annual growth rate in the October-December quarter by up to 0.9 percentage point, Goldman Sachs estimates. If so, the growth rate next quarter would be a scant 1.6 percent, compared with the 2.5 percent that many economists now forecast.
Q. What about the federal borrowing cap? First of all, what is it?
A. It's a legal limit on how much debt the government can pile up. The government accumulates debt two ways: It borrows money from investors by issuing Treasurys. And it borrows from itself, mostly from Social Security revenue.
Q. What if Congress can't agree to raise the cap in time?
A. It could be disastrous. No longer authorized to borrow, the government would have to pay its bills only out of the revenue it gets from taxes and fees. This would force the government to immediately slash spending by 32 percent, the Bipartisan Policy Center estimates. Most analysts think the government would delay paying each day's bills until it had accumulated enough money to pay them all.
Even worse, the government could miss interest payments on Treasurys, triggering a first-ever default by the U.S. government. U.S. Treasurys are held by banks, governments and individuals worldwide. Ultimately, a prolonged default could lead to a global financial crisis.
At the same time, Social Security and other benefit payments would be delayed. Government contractors might not be paid and would likely lay off workers. Paychecks for military personnel could be delayed.
The government actually reached its borrowing limit back in May. Since then, the Treasury has taken a variety of measures to avoid exceeding it. But the cash generated by those measures will run out sometime between Oct. 22 and Oct. 31, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates.
The date isn't exact because it isn't possible to foresee precisely how much revenue the government will receive and when.
Q. Will the economy escape harm if both deadlines are met?
A. Probably. But even brinksmanship can have consequences. The last major fight over the borrowing cap, in the summer of 2011, wasn't resolved until hours before the deadline. Even though the deadline was met, Standard & Poor's issued the first-ever downgrade of long-term U.S. credit. That, in turn, led to a 635-point plunge in the Dow Jones industrial average the next day.
In August that year, consumer confidence plummeted to its lowest level since April 2009, when the economy was in recession. Spending at retail stores weakened.
"The fallout nearly caused the fragile economic recovery to stall," says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics.
The International Monetary Fund estimated last month that U.S. budget disputes, like the 2011 showdown, can slow annual growth by up to 0.5 percentage point in other parts of the world.
The Government Accountability Office later estimated that just the threat of default escalated the government's borrowing costs that year by $1.3 billion, or about 0.5 percent.
The drawn-out fights can cause Americans to delay major purchases, such as for cars or appliances, says Ethan Harris, global economist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. And they can erode confidence in the United States as a place to do business. Employers become less willing to expand and hire.
On Friday, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers and several other business groups urged Congress to fund the government and raise the borrowing limit.
"It is not in the best interest of the employers, employees or the American people to risk a government shutdown that will be economically disruptive and create even more uncertainties for the U.S. economy," the groups said.
Q. All this sounds pretty scary. Why aren't financial markets panicking?
A. Stock prices have fallen in six of the past seven days, partly because of the looming deadlines. But the price declines have been modest. Many investors likely feel they have seen this movie before and know how it ends: with another last-minute deal.
"After several rounds of fiscal brinksmanship ... markets may be somewhat desensitized to the headlines," Alec Phillips, an economist at Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note to clients.
And much has changed since August 2011. The economy has proved more resilient. Growth has remained modest but steady despite tax increases and government spending cuts that kicked in this year. Despite widespread fears, the downgrade of long-term U.S. credit in 2011 didn't cause investors to sell U.S. Treasurys and drive up interest rates and borrowing costs. Rates remained historically low.
The global economy is also in better shape now. Europe emerged from recession in the April-June quarter. Many investors may be poised to scoop up bargains if financial markets fall in response to Washington's budgetary standoffs.
Previously, "those investors who've kept their cool have been rewarded," says David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Funds.

Thursday, September 26, 2013

John Boehner’s Tourette’s syndrome

John Boehner’s Tourette’s syndrome

 Liberal Bias

John Boehner’s Tourette’s syndrome The deficit is down 37.6 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
For 2012, the government spent $973.8 billion more than it took in for the first 10 months of the budget year. The deficit for the same period in 2013 is $607.4. This year’s total deficit is projected to be $670 billion.
As a share of gross domestic product, the deficit was recently as high as 10.1 percent in 2009, when the deficit was $1.4 trillion. It is around 4 percent of GDP for 2013, which means the deficit has been cut by more than 50% since 2009.

John Boehner’s response: CUTS!…. MORE CUTS!…… Definitely, definitely need MORE CUTS!! Diagnosis: Tourette’s Syndrome.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Senators Should Replace Sequester, Progressive Caucus Leaders Urge

Senators Should Replace Sequester, Progressive Caucus Leaders Urge

  Emma Dumain

 

The co-chairmen of the Congressional Progressive Caucus oppose the House-passed continuing resolution at $986 billion — and they want Democratic senators to join them.
As the Senate began consideration Monday of a CR to fund the government past Sept. 30, Democratic Reps. Raúl M. Grijalva of Arizona and Keith Ellison of Minnesota sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
The letter, obtained by CQ Roll Call, urges senators to send back to the House a spending bill that, unlike the House measure, replaces automatic budget cuts known as the sequester.
“We join our leadership and colleagues in strong opposition to the sequester and the CR level that locks it in,” they wrote. “We urge you to do the same.”
McConnell is unlikely to heed the call. And while Reid doesn’t need to be convinced that the sequester is bad and the GOP is to blame, he has given no sign that he is looking to change the spending level in the bill. Instead, he is focused on removing House language defunding Obamacare. Plus, the White House signaled last week that it would sign a stopgap spending measure at sequester levels, providing some political cover for Democrats.
But the letter shows how hard a fight this could be in the House, where Democratic votes could make the difference between passage of a “clean” CR and a shutdown. Grijalva and Ellison are prepared to whip votes against a sequester-level CR among the 70-plus members of the Progressive Caucus, and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Whip Steny H. Hoyer, D-Md., have also said they oppose the $986 billion level.
The full letter is here:

September 23, 2013
Dear Senator Reid and Senator McConnell.
Thank you for your hard work in the US Senate addressing critical issues that are facing our country. We write today to express our opposition to a continuing resolution (CR) for FY 2014 that funds the government at $986 billion, which would lock in cuts made by the sequester. As you know, the sequester budget has slowed our economic recovery and has deprived the most vulnerable Americans of assistance on which they rely. The economic and social harm resulting from the sequester will accelerate with each successive year. In contrast a clean CR would warrant support from the Democratic Caucus in the House.
We cannot support funding levels that add to the extensive damage already caused by the sequester. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the sequester could cost as many as 1.6 million jobs in 2014. It has already cut nutrition assistance to children, research for diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’ s Disease, education for children from low-income families, disaster relief grants and other important programs that we entrust to the public sector. Extending post-sequester levels will create a dangerous new baseline that locks in historically low funding levels. The House passed CR, which amounts to a 15 percent cut from enacted 2013 levels to nondefense discretionary accounts, endorses the destructive cuts demanded by sequester. Worse, it deepens the cuts to non-defense accounts while signaling intention to alleviate only the defense cuts.
A vote for a CR at $986 billion is a vote to continue the policy that will cost Americans millions of jobs when they are desperately needed. We join our leadership and colleagues in strong opposition to the sequester and the CR funding level that locks it in. We urge you to do the same.

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Another Shutdown Showdown


ABC News Banner

By MICHAEL FALCONE ( @michaelpfalcone )
NOTABLES
Gty john boehner dm 130919 16x9 608 Another Shutdown Showdown

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
  • HOUSE GOES ALL-IN TO DEFUND OBAMACARE: With Washington hurtling toward the brink of another fiscal crisis, House Speaker John Boehner set up a major showdown with the Democratic-led Senate when he announced yesterday that the House of Representatives will vote as soon as this week to send a continuing resolution to the Senate that permanently defunds the Affordable Care Act, ABC's JOHN PARKINSON reports. "We're going to continue do everything we can to repeal the president's failed health care law," Boehner, R-Ohio, said during a news conference today at the Capitol. "The law is a train wreck. The president has protected American big business. It's time to protect American families from this unworkable law." http://abcn.ws/1gz8Ha4
  • 'STRANGE AND WEIRD': Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said yesterday that the Senate is standing by as it awaits a "strange and weird" decision from the House of Representatives that will likely cater to a group of conservative Republicans whom Reid described as "anarchists." "We're now waiting to see what the House of Representatives is going to do, how absurd it is going to be what they're going to send us," Reid, D-Nev., said on the Senate floor. "They do not want government to work on any level, not the local level, not the state level, and certainly not here."
  • NEXT STEPS: The House is expected to pass its continuing resolution that also defunds Obamacare by the end of the week. Next week the House is expected to introduce its plan to increase the debt limit. A vote on the debt limit bill could happen as soon as the end of the month. Although the Democrat-led Senate is unlikely to accept the bold move, Speaker Boehner would not predict what would happen next if the Senate restored funding for the health care law. "There should be no conversation about shutting the government down. That's not the goal here. Our goal here is to cut spending and to protect the American people from Obamacare," Boehner said. "It's as simple as that. There's no interest on our part in shutting the government down." The current continuing resolution runs out Sept. 30. http://abcn.ws/1gz8Ha4
  • OBAMA ACCUSES GOP OF EXTORTION: President Obama yesterday accused House Republicans of extortion, saying a "faction" of lawmakers threatens to force the United States into default unless he agrees to delay or defund his signature health care law, ABC's DEVIN DWYER and JONATHAN KARL. "You have never seen in the history of the United States the debt ceiling or the threat of not raising the debt ceiling being used to extort a president … and trying to force issues that have nothing to do with the budget and have nothing to do with the debt," Obama said in speech to the Business Roundtable, a nonpartisan association of top American CEOs. "That a budget is contingent on us eliminating a program that was voted on, passed by both chambers of Congress, ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court, is two weeks from being fully implemented and that helps 30 million people finally get health care coverage; we've never seen that become the issue around a budget battle," he said of the Affordable Care Act. http://abcn.ws/1aL8iAH
THE ROUNDTABLE
ABC's JEFF ZELENY: Will the government really shutdown on Oct. 1 or will Republicans and Democrats ultimately reach agreement on their bitter budget battle? The answer to that question depends on the outcome of a deepening civil war among Congressional Republicans. Speaker Boehner, bowing to the wishes of conservatives in his caucus, is tying the latest budget fight to a new push to defund Obamacare. That effort faces steep odds in the Senate. So steep, in fact, Sen. Ted Cruz suggested it was impossible, even though he's been leading the charge for months. His defeatist comments enraged some House Republicans, who hoped he would lead them into battle against the White House. So why does this matter? The only way for Republicans to prevail in this uphill fight is by keeping a unified front. Now, it is anything but. You can tell by the grinning faces of Democrats.
ABC's RICK KLEIN: In the short, mostly charmed Senate career of Ted Cruz, he's gotten his share of blowback from the Republican side. But the battle he provoked yesterday among House Republicans - not just leadership aides, but rank-and-filers who actually agree with him on the policy choices - is something different. Cruz's statement that Senate Democrats "likely" have the votes to preserve Obamacare funding, coming even before House Republicans take the vote he browbeat them into taking, struck some House members as lecturing from the sidelines. "Do something…" Tweeted Rep. Tim Griffin, R-Ark. "Wave white flag and surrender," went the Tweet from Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wis. It hints at rivalries and mistrust between the legislative bodies, and also some unease among Republicans about the path Cruz is leading them down. In the high-stakes game of funding for the government, members of Congress are already worrying about who will take the blame when the string is played out. So yes, Cruz is getting his way - but not entirely comfortably.
ABC's MICHAEL FALCONE: The powerful and well-funded conservative outside group, Americans for Prosperity, is taking to the airwaves again, launching their most significant television advertising blitz yet on the issue of Obamacare. Americans for Prosperity is releasing a new 60-second ad today featuring a Florida woman named Tricia who tells her personal story of surviving cancer. "The changes in our health care system are a big concern to me," Tricia says in the ad. "Obamacare is dangerous. It can't be implemented. Your well-being judged by a bureaucrat in DC is devastating." The group is putting real financial muscle behind their latest ad - $3 million, according to a source familiar with the buy. The ad will run in six states (Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia) between now and Oct. 1. "AFP will continue to lead the charge on the grassroots level in exposing the negative consequence of Obama's health care law," a spokesperson for Americans for Prosperity told ABC News. "Throughout the country, AFP state chapters have held an average of 75 events a month focused on the health care law." Here's the ad: http://youtu.be/Zk2d_liZqpk
BUZZ
DONNA BRAZILE TAKES THE "THIS WEEK" QUIZ: What's the Democratic strategist's guilty pleasure? Her favorite movie? Her heroes? See her handwritten answers below and be sure to tweet us@ThisWeekABC and tell us who you'd like to be our next participant: http://abcn.ws/189uC6D
COMBATIVE ASSAD SAYS HE COULD PROVIDE LIST OF WEAPONS 'TOMORROW'. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to deny that Syria used chemical weapons against its own people, says he is fully committed to handing over Syrian chemical weapons to international control, and that he could provide a list of his chemical weapons stockpile "tomorrow," as Russia and the United States said they would expect him to do under their agreement reached last weekend, ABC's CHRIS GOOD reports. But perhaps the most notable thing about Assad's latest interview with a Western journalist, this time with Fox News' Greg Palkot and former U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, was its surreal vibe. Despite the certainties of the United States and other Western countries, and the points raised by his interviewers, Assad repeatedly beat back at the notion that the August attack outside Damascus was perpetrated by his regime. And he appeared fully convinced of all he was telling the reporter and the former liberal firebrand, making for a strange and mildly confrontational window into the Syrian president's message. Here were the oddest moments: http://abcn.ws/1aMa9F6
MARK ZUCKERBERG ACKNOWLEDGES NEED TO 'DEBUG' HIS POLITICAL GROUP. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is in Washington this week lobbying lawmakers in the House on immigration reform, but he acknowledged last night that a political group he founded to support the issue, FWD.us, has hit some snags in its foray into politics, ABC's ABBY PHILIP reports. "There's been a lot to debug in terms of making this work," Zuckerberg said at a question and answer forum sponsored by "The Atlantic." The group, supported by wealthy Silicon Valley types such as Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer and Google CEO Eric Schmidt, got into some trouble with progressives after it launched ads intended to give Republicans who supported immigration reform political cover by praising them for their opposition to President Obama's health care law or supporting the expansion of the Keystone XL pipeline. The strategy was panned as "counterproductive" by liberal groups like Moveon.org and Progressives United, which participated in a boycott of ads on Facebook. Zuckerberg, a relative newbie to political lobbying, said the aversion to crossing party lines even on issues both sides support "shocked" him. "We've tried to get senior folks from both parties to come together and there have been interesting realities of that I was kind of shocked about," he said. "A senior Democrat would never want to associate with something funding Republicans." http://abcn.ws/16nDfGM
NOTED: Zuckerberg wouldn't answer most questions that might hint at his political leanings. Where does he fall on the political spectrum? "It's hard to affiliate as either a Democrat or a Republican. I'm pro-knowledge economy," Zuckerberg replied after a long trailing answer on a host of other tangentially related subjects. Who is the person he most looks forward to meeting while in Washington? After another long pause: "That's dangerous," Zuckerberg finally replied. http://abcn.ws/16nDfGM
CONGRESSMAN LAMENTS 'MAKING $172,000. - In a closed meeting yesterday, Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., who is also running for Senate, lamented that he is "stuck here making $172,000 a year" in Congress. The comment, which was confirmed to ABC News and first reported by National Review, came at a closed-door meeting with lawmakers during a discussion about potentially reversing the Office of Personnel Management's ruling that will continue to contribute to the health care coverage of members of Congress and their staff,ABC's ARLETTE SAENZ reports. Several lawmakers expressed their concern about potentially having to pay this portion of their health care themselves if the OPM ruling is repealed. "Before you support this, go home and talk to your spouse," Rep. Frank Lucas, R-Okla., said. Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, said reversing the OPM ruling could cost him $12,000 a year. "That's a burden. And it's a burden on our staff, too," he said. But Gingrey was less sympathetic to those concerns and bemoaned the fact that young Capitol Hill aides could become lobbyists in a few years "and make 500,000 a year." "Meanwhile, I'm stuck here making $172,000 a year," Gingrey said. (Members of Congress make $174,000 a year). http://abcn.ws/17KC4nO
JEB BUSH CAUTIONS GOP OVER EFFORTS TO DEFUND OBAMACARE. Former Florida governor Jeb Bush yesterday suggested that the chances of a Republican controlled House of Representatives defunding Obamacare are slim, but the risks are high to the Republican Party if they fail to fund the government, ABC's ABBY PHILLIP writes. "If you control one half of one third of the levers in Washington, D.C your ability to influence things are also relative to the fact that you have one half of one third of the government," Bush said at the National Press Club today. "That's the reality." Bush, who has frequently offered advice to the G.O.P that has strayed from the more conservative base of the party, added that as the country approached the real deadline for when the government runs out of money to fund its operations, the stakes would get higher for Republicans. Bush's statements are in sharp contrast to Louisiana Governor and Chairman of the Republican Governors Association, Bobby Jindal, who said the effort to "repeal and defund is certainly a fight worth having." http://abcn.ws/14jxL2r
DUELING GOVERNORS: RICK PERRY VS. MARTIN O'MALLEY. Texas Gov. Rick Perry has his eyes on wooing jobs away from Maryland, but those jobs are staying put if it's up to Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley,ABC's ARLETTE SAENZ notes. In his latest economic development campaign, Perry traveled to Maryland this week to ask businesses to consider setting up shop in Texas. Perry has conducted similar campaigns in states including California, Missouri and New York, and has sometimes gotten under his fellow governors' skin with his blatant tactics. As he's done in other states, Perry infiltrated the television and radio waves in Maryland last week with advertisements touting the economic opportunities available in the Lone Star State. "When you grow tired of Maryland taxes squeezing every dime out of your business, think Texas," Perry said in one advertisement. "Unfortunately, your governor has made Maryland the tax and fee state, where businesses pay some of the highest taxes in America. That's a job killer." But with Perry set to start his job poaching tour in Maryland this week, O'Malley fired back by penning an op-ed in the Washington Post laying out the case for "What Maryland does better than Texas." http://abcn.ws/18AmFU8
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
CHAINED TO WHITE HOUSE FENCE: IMMIGRANTS PROTEST OBAMA DEPORTATIONS.Seven activists chained themselves to the front gate of the White House lawn Wednesday in protest of deportations, reports ABC's MARY ALICE PARKS. "Not one more," they chanted. "Not one more." In 2012, the Obama administration deported 409,849 immigrants, according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Opponents argue the record number of deportations is tearing families apart. Federal officials say they are simply enforcing the law. "President Obama needs to know the suffering he causes in our communities," said Tomas Martinez, a volunteer organizer with the Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, which helped organized the White House protest. "We have organized marches, spoken to legislators, signed petitions, made phone calls, but we have to do more." Last June, President Obama announced a so-called deferred action policy that would temporarily halt deportations of undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children, completed high school, and have no criminal record. Immigrant advocates want Obama to now extend a moratorium on deportations to all undocumented persons. Obama ruled out a broader suspension of deportations in an interview with Spanish-language network Telemundo on Tuesday. "I would be ignoring the law in a way that I think would be very difficult to defend legally," Obama said. "That's not an option."http://abcn.ws/18a3FQ8

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Today's #Teamster News 09.15.13

Today's Teamster News 09.15.13
Point, counterpoint: Teamsters, St. James debate labor contract snags The Montana Standard ...Some unionized employees have taken a strike vote against St. James Healthcare, but hope a Sept. 19 mediation session will deter such action...
Income Inequality Economic Populist ...The top 1% income earners have captured 95% of the income growth from 2009 to 2012. Folks, that's pretty much all of it...
The Stupid Trade Talk Process Trade Reform ...Yum Brands, the owner of KFC, wants cheaper chicken wings, rumps and other assorted poultry parts. Ocean Spray wants an easing of pesticide regulations. DuPont wants greater protection of trade secrets. Negotiations have barely begun for a potentially sweeping trade pact between the United States and Europe. But the lobbying is already well under way by corporations on both sides of the Atlantic...
Wynne Godley's Crucial Warnings About the Trade Deficit Still Ignored American Economic Alert ...Godley was one of the few mainstream economists who warned that huge, ballooning trade deficits like those amassed by the United States since the mid-1990s would lead to major trouble. Further, Godley’s model notably that reducing domestic budget deficits without addressing trade deficits would bring on a thoroughly unnecessary disaster on the home front – and in the rest of a world so heavily dependent on supplying American demand...
McViolation: How American Fast Food Operators Break the Law Huffington Post ...Among the most common violations is wage theft, a term used to describe practices that deprive employees of wages to which they are legally entitled. Across all industries, American workers lose an estimated $30 billion a year to wage theft...
Where's the Beef?: The First Thing Obama Can Do By Himself to Create Good Jobs Next New Deal ...A presidential executive order could directly help Lucila and the millions like her who manufacture uniforms for our military, care for our elders under Medicare, work as security guards at federally leased buildings, or are laborers on federally funded construction projects. The order would require that jobs financed by federal funds require living wages (not just minimum wage or prevailing wage in a low-wage sector), paid sick days, and prohibitions against employers fighting unionization...
Factory Rebirth Fizzles in U.S. as Work Shipped Overseas Bloomberg ...That left the factory workforce through August about 13 percent smaller than the 13.7 million when the U.S. fell into recession in December 2007. In 2000, the tally was 17 million...
Clifford Chance trainee lawyer faces sack after describing his work as 'f***ing people over for money' The Independent ...Clifford Chance, an international firm based in London and part of the ‘Magic Circle’ group of the UK’s five leading law firms, is also one of the 10 largest in the world in terms of number of lawyers and revenues...
Wall St. Exploits Ethanol Credits, and Prices Spike New York Times ...Wall Street ... set out to exploit this young market ... that is what happened this year when the price of the ethanol credits skyrocketed 20-fold in just six months...
How High 401(k) Fees Can Doom Your Retirement Plans Slate ...One of several big problems with 401(k) plans—tax subsidies for retirement savings—is that while some of the subsidy accrues to savers, some of it accrues to fee collectors who you end of paying for managing the plan...
Mississippi sitting on $872 million of Katrina funds Daily Kos ...More than half of the unspent money is tied up in a hotly debated plan to expand the state-owned Port of Gulfport, and millions more are allocated for projects that have yet to materialize. Critics also complain that some projects are far from the Katrina strike zone and don't seem to have a direct connection to recovery from the hurricane, while others have failed to take root or are not meeting promises of creating jobs...
Wisconsin Attorney General Seeks to Vitiate Open Records Law to Protect ALEC’s National Treasurer Center for Media and Democracy ...Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen has taken the unprecedented step of asserting that a state legislator cannot be held accountable for refusing to disclose public records in response to a lawful open records request by the Center for Media and Democracy...






Today's #Teamster News 09.15.13 http://t.co/VdAxisl0Ld #1U #union #wiunion #katrina #ows